That doesn’t matter. Cops have to respond to every call here there’s potential violence; otherwise it looks like they were complacent while someone was seriously harmed or potentially killed. The history of the property is irrelevant
That's completely untrue. If that were the case then every single one of the SWATing calls would have meant guns drawn and multiple cops. Most of the time the merely did wellness checks or talked to Pat through his intercom.
Did you actually read the statement of fact? Go to Count E. This is like the fifth time that Evans responded to the house. Every time, he takes it further than any of the other cops do. He's been briefed repeatedly by his commanding officer in person and by email about Pat's house being a known SWATing house. For Count E, Pat had been SWATed four times the previous day. "Dispatch noted in the CAD, ****Be advised swatting related call**** and “swatting risk at this location—a sgt[.] is to be dispatched with squads to all calls at this location.”" Petersen talked to Pat, "Petersen would later testify that he knew there wasn’t an emergency.". The situation was handled and done with. Then Evans arrived, him and Pat start arguing, then Evans and Petersen start trying to kick the door down.
So Evans knows it's a SWATing house, has been there personally a handful of times, was told that this specific call was a likely SWATing call, is there only because it's a known SWATing call (he's a sergeant and they need one there), the other officer has already handled it and knows there's no emergency, and this dipshit still argues and fights with Pat and tries to forceably enter the home. And reminder, this Statement of Fact is something that both sides have agreed is the truth. These aren't allegations by Pat. MPD agrees they're facts.
Sorry to break kayfabe here but Evans is a complete retard and Pat might actually have some kind of a case against him. I can't imagine any of the other officers facing any consequences but Evans actually might.