Robinson et al v. City of Milwaukee et al

[Sexual_Tyrannosaurus]

Will this be a jury trial? If so, Pat may have a case, because juries are retarded. Especially in Wisconsin.

 

[swole_edging_llc]

I have not been following this but I read a few pages and you funsters are likely confusing dismissal with a motion for summary judgment. Broadly a motion to dismiss is the judge agreeing that there nothing in the complaint that is "applicable" law. What was presented even if true does not rise to the level of prima facie or isn't applicable to the venue, torts etc. This is usually pre discovery. You might be familiar with a certain Mrs krinsky. Slapp is like a specific kind of dismissal.

A motion for summary judgment is probably what you're conflating here. That's the judge saying. Even if all the facts under dispute are true it can be decided as a matter of law. Juries basically say if a fact is true or not. And a judge determines applicability process etc. If there's no facts for a jury to decide, then there's no trial. It could also be the judge saying none of this evidence is material or relevant even if true as well.

Qualified immunity would be this case,not a motion to dismiss. Msj comes during or after discovery. Because there's no evidence to rule on yet.


Trust me my father is a retired judge. This is 100% true.

Not all of us have a judge in the family.
What's the one sentence synopsis?

 

[Treat Yourself]

Will this be a jury trial? If so, Pat may have a case, because juries are retarded. Especially in Wisconsin.

Titty Two Chins doesn't have a good track record of making people like him.

 

[RickReternal]

If there’s a trial, would Dan Mullen be called to testify? Would quasi/Boomia submit a deposition?

 

[NoBacon]

I have not been following this but I read a few pages and you funsters are likely confusing dismissal with a motion for summary judgment. Broadly a motion to dismiss is the judge agreeing that there nothing in the complaint that is "applicable" law. What was presented even if true does not rise to the level of prima facie or isn't applicable to the venue, torts etc. This is usually pre discovery. You might be familiar with a certain Mrs krinsky. Slapp is like a specific kind of dismissal.

A motion for summary judgment is probably what you're conflating here. That's the judge saying. Even if all the facts under dispute are true it can be decided as a matter of law. Juries basically say if a fact is true or not. And a judge determines applicability process etc. If there's no facts for a jury to decide, then there's no trial. It could also be the judge saying none of this evidence is material or relevant even if true as well.

Qualified immunity would be this case,not a motion to dismiss. Msj comes during or after discovery. Because there's no evidence to rule on yet.


Trust me my father is a retired judge. This is 100% true.

I feel like you’re wrong, and feeling is believing now. No map no plan no guide.

 

[UnPRePared]

Will this be a jury trial? If so, Pat may have a case, because juries are retarded. Especially in Wisconsin.

"LeT us correcT the record, prosecuTor child!"

 

[Rudderman]

If there’s a trial, would Dan Mullen be called to testify? Would quasi/Boomia submit a deposition?

Dan and Boomia should file amicus briefs to ensure that the court and potential jurors know that Pat is a FFwBT.

 

[UnPRePared]

Dan and Boomia should fuck already and get it over with.

 

[RoTheHo69]

Can anyone come up with a scenario where it makes sense to email the cops and tell them they failed to handcuff you?

I don't understand.

The logic behind that continues to elude me.

I believe he was shit talking them.

 

[iBangedQuasi]

I'm listening to Mad At The Internet at work because it's better background drivel than an Irish midget with downs syndrome (that's a reference to you, Dan) and that Josh seems to think Patti is gonna get a couple hundred grand from the suit.
Starts at 1:25':30 ish, he talks briefly about the liberated patio furnie then talks about the lawsuit, idk how to timestamp rumble videos

 

[UnPRePared]

I'm listening to Mad At The Internet at work because it's better background drivel than an Irish midget with downs syndrome (that's a reference to you, Dan) and that Josh seems to think Patti is gonna get a couple hundred grand from the suit.
Starts at 1:25':30 ish, he talks briefly about the liberated patio furnie then talks about the lawsuit, idk how to timestamp rumble videos

... What?

No fucking way that even Milwaukee is this stupid.

 

[Jim Norton Bug Chaser]

I'm listening to Mad At The Internet at work because it's better background drivel than an Irish midget with downs syndrome (that's a reference to you, Dan) and that Josh seems to think Patti is gonna get a couple hundred grand from the suit.
Starts at 1:25':30 ish, he talks briefly about the liberated patio furnie then talks about the lawsuit, idk how to timestamp rumble videos

This is troubling. Josh Moon is a brilliant legal mind and has always had a total grasp on the Patrick situation.

 

[Mass.gov]

This is what this is all about, marks...

I'm always right...

 

[Niggerotchi]

This is what this is all about, marks...

I'm always right...

Lying in order to steal 100k from taxpayers makes you right in which way? How is that finessing anything? Rick with a couple 100k would be hilarious.

 

[RobertMewler]

Lying in order to steal 100k from taxpayers makes you right in which way? How is that finessing anything? Rick with a couple 100k would be hilarious.

Theory: He's hoping for a big pay day win from the lolsuit so he can finally go after Dan and anyone else's name he has.

 

[Udders]

Theory: He's hoping for a big pay day win from the lolsuit so he can finally go after Dan and anyone else's name he has.

Absolutely, although he really doesn't have much of anything else.

 

[UnPRePared]

Theory: He's hoping for a big pay day win from the lolsuit so he can finally go after Dan and anyone else's name he has.

I'll be checking my mail.

 

[NoBacon]

Theory: He's hoping for a big pay day win from the lolsuit so he can finally go after Dan and anyone else's name he has.

He should remember kiwifarms user 1997 Toyota Tacoma has claimed full responsibility for any and all illegal activity involving Patrick.

 

[Dog Eater]

He should remember kiwifarms user 1997 Toyota Tacoma has claimed full responsibility for any and all illegal activity involving Patrick.

That guy is claiming to be the Craigslist poster over on kiwifarms. I hope Patrick gets him good.

 

[DominusOdium]

In that scenario, Would they sue him for it back upon discovering his payments to Torswats and arrest him?