- Forum Clout
- 6,202
Josh is a retard who thought Quasi wouldn’t get his money. He’s also spent years losing money to nuisance lawsuits made by a retard with a hairlip.
-
Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
[email protected]
Robinson et al v. City of Milwaukee et al
- Thread starter Cumtown Fags
- Start date
- Forum Clout
- 6,643
I doubt they’re gonna offer a settlement. I hope it turns out a like an episode of law and order where he thinks he’s going to get away with it but they arrest him for swatting himself.
- Forum Clout
- 78,298
Reminder that null was shocked I was able to you know use existing laws to remain anonymous. And never even considered recovering attorney fees as a possibility.
- Forum Clout
- 17,941
Yeah, but did you start a family?
- Forum Clout
- 50,545
Five phrases have been burned into my brain since I've started reading the Forums:
- "... Maybe kiss you"
- "That's your bit?"
- "I want to start a family"
- "My babies are gone"
- "Give my asshole head"
- Forum Clout
- 909
Has any brotherman happened to email the city's legal team regarding the Airbnb situation? Asking them perchance have they requested his business/occupancy records? Just curious.
- Forum Clout
- 2,240
I guess you could say his opinion is...null and void.
- Forum Clout
- 23,139
Yeah Null really knows the in and outs of law, he said pat was gonna win the lawsuit against Quasi too, and we know how that happened.
Last edited:
- Forum Clout
- 51,108
He's a lot like Pat. They both think that being in a number of legal proceedings somehow makes them experts. Josh won a single lawsuit and now LARPs like he passed the bar.
- Forum Clout
- 5,893
Hard to believe that post was like 3 years ago. "I'm looking down the barrel of 30. I've done nothing with my life besides operate a hate website." Nigga's about to turn 32 now. Dick don't work, still fat, probably a pedo too. JOSHUA MOON IS A PEDOPHILE RAPIST
- Forum Clout
- 76,245
Their lawyers will never get Pat. He's too greasy!
- Forum Clout
- 51,130
This bears repeating.
- Forum Clout
- 38,100
MKE have responded to the claims made by Fatty.
1. Niki Robinson and Patrick Tomlinson are the targets of a vicious campaign of domestic terrorism, carried out at the hands of a group of bullies who hide behind the anonymity of the internet.
RESPONSE: Defendants lack information as to whether the acts qualify as “domestic terrorism” and lack knowledge and/or information about who is carrying out the alleged “campaign of domestic terrorism.”
2. The bullies’ main weapon of choice is something called “swatting,” which is when someone who wants to endanger the life and safety of another calls 911 and lies to provoke a dangerous police response to the victim’s home.
RESPONSE: Defendants lack knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about who is committing the “swatting” and whether this is the “main weapon of choice” but further admit the general definition of swatting.
3. The goal is to either harm or terrorize an innocent person at the hands of the police, who the caller is hoping will barge into their victim’s home and, in the chaos, injure or kill them.
RESPONSE: Defendants lack knowledge and information sufficient to form a belief about the goals of the person(s) engaging in the swattings, and any response to this paragraph would require speculation.
4. “Swatting” has become a widespread and well-known method of harassment, with several states and the federal government adopting harsh criminal penalties to deter would-be swatters.
RESPONSE: Defendants lack information and knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the matters alleged, and therefore deny.
5. Normally the police are unwitting tools of these bad actors who have no choice but to take these false calls at face value.
RESPONSE: Defendants lack information and knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the matters alleged, and therefore deny.
6. But Niki and Patrick’s situation is different because the Milwaukee Police Department has responded to swatting calls to their home at least 45 times in the past two years.
RESPONSE: Admit.
7. Any rational police force would have recognized at some point that any calls involving the Robinson-Tomlinson home were clearly false and should not be taken seriously.
RESPONSE: Defendants lack information sufficient to form a belief as to what plaintiffs mean by “taken seriously” and therefore deny
Many Many more......
215. The aforementioned actions of Defendants were the direct and proximate cause of the constitutional violations set forth above and of Plaintiffs’ injuries and damages set forth above. RESPONSE: Deny.
1. Niki Robinson and Patrick Tomlinson are the targets of a vicious campaign of domestic terrorism, carried out at the hands of a group of bullies who hide behind the anonymity of the internet.
RESPONSE: Defendants lack information as to whether the acts qualify as “domestic terrorism” and lack knowledge and/or information about who is carrying out the alleged “campaign of domestic terrorism.”
2. The bullies’ main weapon of choice is something called “swatting,” which is when someone who wants to endanger the life and safety of another calls 911 and lies to provoke a dangerous police response to the victim’s home.
RESPONSE: Defendants lack knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about who is committing the “swatting” and whether this is the “main weapon of choice” but further admit the general definition of swatting.
3. The goal is to either harm or terrorize an innocent person at the hands of the police, who the caller is hoping will barge into their victim’s home and, in the chaos, injure or kill them.
RESPONSE: Defendants lack knowledge and information sufficient to form a belief about the goals of the person(s) engaging in the swattings, and any response to this paragraph would require speculation.
4. “Swatting” has become a widespread and well-known method of harassment, with several states and the federal government adopting harsh criminal penalties to deter would-be swatters.
RESPONSE: Defendants lack information and knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the matters alleged, and therefore deny.
5. Normally the police are unwitting tools of these bad actors who have no choice but to take these false calls at face value.
RESPONSE: Defendants lack information and knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the matters alleged, and therefore deny.
6. But Niki and Patrick’s situation is different because the Milwaukee Police Department has responded to swatting calls to their home at least 45 times in the past two years.
RESPONSE: Admit.
7. Any rational police force would have recognized at some point that any calls involving the Robinson-Tomlinson home were clearly false and should not be taken seriously.
RESPONSE: Defendants lack information sufficient to form a belief as to what plaintiffs mean by “taken seriously” and therefore deny
Many Many more......
215. The aforementioned actions of Defendants were the direct and proximate cause of the constitutional violations set forth above and of Plaintiffs’ injuries and damages set forth above. RESPONSE: Deny.
- Forum Clout
- 8,622
i hope these inspire you for your next album
- Forum Clout
- 9,135
34 pages. Fun start to the weekend!
- Forum Clout
- 36,586
Fucking ribs. "You don't wanna be handcuffed after a false call? Well maybe don't refuse to answer the officers asking if your wife is safe then barrel outside butt naked shrieking high-pitched threats and lunge at an officer." It's over.
edit: HAHAHAHAHAHA HOLEEEEEEEEE SHIT
I'm dying
Last edited:
- Forum Clout
- 36,586
- Forum Clout
- 38,100
Most of MKE responses can be summed up with "not so"
Niki let them in to look around because she isn't a belligerent fat oaf.
Niki let them in to look around because she isn't a belligerent fat oaf.