• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

Robinson et al v. City of Milwaukee et al

Racist Google Intern

Please watch the Itchy and Scratchy Friends Hour!
Forum Clout
23,141
New order on KF:
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/patric...h-padawan-v-2-5.65412/page-3627#post-19713512



88ec7f2674a73974843cfbe3312e5a62.png

11596ee5373667008f498331dd94e468.png

Gotta wait til feburary fawwwwk
 

Confused White Kid

Influencer
Forum Clout
17,840
I don't know what any of this means, but if this goes to discovery, Rick has put himself in a bit of a pickle regarding bodycam footage.

As Rick is accusing them of using excessive force and being dicks about the whole thing, it would benefit the cops to keep the footage sealed, but it would benefit Rick to release it. Can the footage be included in the evidence and not made public just because Rick doesn't want us to see it?

Rick winning a million dollars will be well worth it if we get footage of his micropenis. Hahahahaha.
 

Honoria

Forum Clout
7,407
Looks like the most blatant dumb stuff got dismissed. This will drag out longer and cost Rick more money, which is good.

Skimming through this, it almost sounds like they're saying that it's not going to work but they can only dismiss the obvious (Count one with Pat's faucet) right now, but can definitely dismiss the other stuff later.
 

Confused White Kid

Influencer
Forum Clout
17,840
Looks like the most blatant dumb stuff got dismissed. This will drag out longer and cost Rick more money, which is good.

Skimming through this, it almost sounds like they're saying that it's not going to work but they can only dismiss the obvious (Count one with Pat's faucet) right now, but can definitely dismiss the other stuff later.

Does it say they will let the cops plead immunity later?

Rick's not going to read that part.
 

chewtoyrapist

Comin for that ass, nigga.
Forum Clout
16,466
I don't know what any of this means, but if this goes to discovery, Rick has put himself in a bit of a pickle regarding bodycam footage.

As Rick is accusing them of using excessive force and being dicks about the whole thing, it would benefit the cops to keep the footage sealed, but it would benefit Rick to release it. Can the footage be included in the evidence and not made public just because Rick doesn't want us to see it?

Rick winning a million dollars will be well worth it if we get footage of his micropenis. Hahahahaha.
Not a lawyer, though I am vaguely aware of a lawyer currently acting like a retard. He can definitely ask to have it sealed for privacy purposes and the PD will oblige to show good faith. If a wealthy benefactor/journalist wanted to push the issue as it concerns public safety and the integrity of law enforcement, there is definitely a case to be made to obtain it. Unfortunately they will have to pay to have rick's weiner censored, so you're not getting it no matter how much you lust for it (,stlaker).
 

Treat Yourself

Forum Clout
18,531
"Defendant’s motion to dismiss will be granted as to Count I, granted in part and denied in part as to Counts II and III, and denied as to Counts IV through VII."

The counts from the amended pig grease-stained complaint:
COUNT I: July 25, 2022, Swatting: Unlawful Search and Seizure
COUNT II: August 11, 2022, Swatting: Unlawful Search and Seizure/Failure to Intervene
COUNT III: October 1, 2022, Swatting: Unlawful Search and Seizure/Failure to Intervene.

COUNT IV: March 20, 2023, Swatting: Unlawful Search and Seizure/Failure to Intervene
COUNT V: April 11, 2023, Swatting: Unlawful Search and Seizure/Failure to Intervene
COUNT VI: April 12, 2023, Swatting: Unlawful Search and Seizure/Failure to Intervene
COUNT VII: April 17, 2023, Swatting: Unlawful Search and Seizure/Failure to Intervene

I wonder if it's just a time-related thing. Either way Rick is going to pony up a bunch of money just to show the world his faucet then get laughed out of court on the grounds of qualified immunity or for not giving any evidence for any crimes. Enjoy the next few months, fatso. We. Will.
 

Toothless Enthusiast

Killed by Patrick!
Forum Clout
35,475
"Defendant’s motion to dismiss will be granted as to Count I, granted in part and denied in part as to Counts II and III, and denied as to Counts IV through VII."

The counts from the amended pig grease-stained complaint:
COUNT I: July 25, 2022, Swatting: Unlawful Search and Seizure
COUNT II: August 11, 2022, Swatting: Unlawful Search and Seizure/Failure to Intervene
COUNT III: October 1, 2022, Swatting: Unlawful Search and Seizure/Failure to Intervene.

COUNT IV: March 20, 2023, Swatting: Unlawful Search and Seizure/Failure to Intervene
COUNT V: April 11, 2023, Swatting: Unlawful Search and Seizure/Failure to Intervene
COUNT VI: April 12, 2023, Swatting: Unlawful Search and Seizure/Failure to Intervene
COUNT VII: April 17, 2023, Swatting: Unlawful Search and Seizure/Failure to Intervene

I wonder if it's just a time-related thing. Either way Rick is going to pony up a bunch of money just to show the world his faucet then get laughed out of court on the grounds of qualified immunity. Enjoy the next few months, fatso. We. Will.
Pure speculation but I think the one and only sealed exhibit is the faucet video lmfao

Screenshot-2024-11-01-at-20-17-33.png


Edit: I just reread he previous order and Exhibit A is actually copies of police reports for each day they went. Not sure whether bodycams would fall under this or not?

 
Last edited:

Sue Lightning

IS SHE TALKING ABOUT ME?
Forum Clout
119,181
As Rick is accusing them of using excessive force and being dicks about the whole thing, it would benefit the cops to keep the footage sealed, but it would benefit Rick to release it. Can the footage be included in the evidence and not made public just because Rick doesn't want us to see it?
You’re a literal fucking idiot. Yeah, if bodycams are unsealed, magically Pat would somehow obtain them. And magically Pat would also post them to…own his trolls or something? I’m sure the courts will just let you post the opposing sides evidence on social media.
 

Jenna

very demure very cutesy very mindful very modest
Forum Clout
64,314
I skimmed through the brief on KF, and I'm a below-average idiot who has seen a couple episodes of Suits, but my two takeaways from it were:

1. The judge still sees Rick as a special WHYUS boy and perfect little angel who is never to blame for anything. Which tbf the MPD needs to prove but I guess they figured qualified immunity would be all they needed. The judge seems to conclude that Patrick was a bit frustrated but otherwise respectful and calm during all these interactions, thus the officers had no probable cause to search his property. The reality is he was belligerent, probably drunk, screaming threats at the officers and lunging at them.

2. The case seems mostly to be about the officer's prior awareness that this was a "swatting location", which is why the first count was dismissed. The issue is if the police ever went "hey another call to that Tomlinson prick's house, let's go over and fuck with him again". But I'm not sure how Patrick intends to prove this is the case unless some idiot cop said so much while wearing a bodycam. If all Patrick has is his narcissistic "I know what everybody else is thinking and don't have to prove anything" reasons as to why the police were targeting him, his case is dead. As it is, Satistfy Monell has become the new Satisfy Krinsky, and once again I don't see any reasonable way how Rick could get satisfaction.
 
Top