- Forum Clout
- 48,745
neither do his lawyers, apparently given their initial filingA lawyer definitely wrote part of it. Pat doesn't know how to spell curtilage let alone know the definition of it.
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
neither do his lawyers, apparently given their initial filingA lawyer definitely wrote part of it. Pat doesn't know how to spell curtilage let alone know the definition of it.
He likely insisted on a rewrite and to add his own sections.It's weird but yeah. This was clearly written by a lawyer:
View attachment 218459
Quoting court cases and using unbiased language.
But then there's this:
View attachment 218460
Let me tell you EXACTLY what the swatters were thinking. "Without delving into the gritty details".
It really makes the entire brief really confusing, switching from legalese to Patrick's verbose storytelling.
every time i'm out of the Jenna business.. you PULL ME BACK INIt's to prove, and I quote the brief, "every officer in Milwaukee was aware of Mr. Tomlinson's issues with his harassers".
He put in a legal document what a special, important, famous boy he is. Every officer knows me, child.
Multiple 1000sIf the judge allows this to proceed to trial, whomever is funding their lawsuit will most likely need to shell out MANY more thousands before it can proceed.
If the judge doesn't throw it out and somehow it makes it to trial I think the city is going to settle. I doubt that Milwaukee wants it to go on trial.Multiple 1000s
If the judge doesn't throw it out and somehow it makes it to trial I think the city is going to settle. I doubt that Milwaukee wants it to go on trial.
I figure that both sides want the cheapest, most expedient option - City for a dismissal, and Fatrick for a settlement. I’ve been lucky enough to have this retardation off of my life’s bingo card, but if Milwaukee was going for the most expedient option, wouldn’t they have offered some paltry sum to STFU and go away?If the judge doesn't throw it out and somehow it makes it to trial I think the city is going to settle. I doubt that Milwaukee wants it to go on trial.
Disagree that they avoided embarrassing themselves. As Jenna and some others posted, there is *plenty* of cringey Pat stuff shoehorned into this piece of garbage. However, I do agree that the brief properly written legal section does provide some solid citations of legal precedence which is exactly what they need to get it to go to trial. An actually good lawyer would have written pages and pages of those and cut out all of Pat's nonsense though.I'll come out and say it, I(♥)ANAL, but this seems to be as good as Rick could have replied. Good job by the Strang Bradley guys tardwrangling the pig into submission and avoiding lulzy lines
The beauty of patposting is that it's an infinite-sum game:
- Do the lawsuit get dismissed? LOL
- Do we have a new trial? LMAO
- Does Rick prevail against all odds, and gets some money via settlement/full porcine victory? You just know he will throw all that money back on the roulette table and ask a do over vs Leslie/Quaso/Boomia: Lol, lmao even.
I'll come out and say it, I(♥)ANAL, but this seems to be as good as Rick could have replied. Good job by the Strang Bradley guys tardwrangling the pig into submission and avoiding lulzy lines
The beauty of patposting is that it's an infinite-sum game:
- Do the lawsuit get dismissed? LOL
- Do we have a new trial? LMAO
- Does Rick prevail against all odds, and gets some money via settlement/full porcine victory? You just know he will throw all that money back on the roulette table and ask a do over vs Leslie/Quaso/Boomia: Lol, lmao even.
On the bright side, if it goes to trial then suddenly Pat's word isn't enough no matter how much he oinks about it and body cam footage and police reports have to come into play.
I figure that both sides want the cheapest, most expedient option - City for a dismissal, and Fatrick for a settlement. I’ve been lucky enough to have this retardation off of my life’s bingo card, but if Milwaukee was going for the most expedient option, wouldn’t they have offered some paltry sum to STFU and go away?
On the bright side, if it goes to trial then suddenly Pat's word isn't enough no matter how much he oinks about it and body cam footage and police reports have to come into play. I believe one of those VPN calls mentioned was the one Torswats posted as proof that Pat was paying him to swat him so the Torswats situation suddenly could be in play as well. This is guaranteed ribs for months and Pat will end up paying a fortune for it no matter what.
Imma agree with this. I have a feeling there's enough in there that unless the defense destroys them with FACTS AND LOGIC in the next response, then the judge will want to see this proceed and we'll get a nice circus of pat retardation.I'll come out and say it, I(♥)ANAL, but this seems to be as good as Rick could have replied. Good job by the Strang Bradley guys tardwrangling the pig into submission and avoiding lulzy lines
The beauty of patposting is that it's an infinite-sum game:
- Do the lawsuit get dismissed? LOL
- Do we have a new trial? LMAO
- Does Rick prevail against all odds, and gets some money via settlement/full porcine victory? You just know he will throw all that money back on the roulette table and ask a do over vs Leslie/Quaso/Boomia: Lol, lmao even.
Honestly, I think the opposite. MPD's claim was entirely lawyer-written in lawyer-speak, he responded with more of his storytelling and trying to elicit sympathy.
The crux of the argument is him redefining "seizure" from "the police take your property without cause" to... I don't know. Nothing was ever taken, there's no reported damage, just hurt feelings. When his entire case is built around the 4th amendment against unlawful search and seizure, you kind of have to prove material objects were taken from you by the police. It means what I say it means, judge child.
There's qualified immunity, and then there's the simple fact that sometimes humans have to follow the orders of authority figures. It's like suing the TSA for $1 million because you wanted to fly to Hawaii but refused to go through a metal detector, and claiming that somehow violates your constitutional rights. If a cop asks to see your spouse to make sure she's okay, the reasonable expectation is that your wife comes downstairs so the cop can affirm there's nothing wrong. No civilian has the right to order the police to go away, and both sides have conceded why this is true.
He's put all his cards on the table, and the MPD barely has. Like someone mentioned earlier, he has a police record threatening to kill his ex-wife and unborn baby: that alone goes beyond qualified immunity because Patrick already has a DV charge on his rap sheet.
I wouldn't be surprised if the judge outright dismisses the case based on how poor this brief is.
Still ribbin ya, but Rick didn't get shit technically or otherwise.Rick technically got a small win in the temporary restriction order against BDA but then that gave us one of the best audios of the entire saga.
As far as I read they're in discovery now. That's why the city told him to fuck off in their motion.Imma agree with this. I have a feeling there's enough in there that unless the defense destroys them with FACTS AND LOGIC in the next response, then the judge will want to see this proceed and we'll get a nice circus of pat retardation.
I just really hope the judge lets this go to discovery because it's all vague enough that maybe something wrong did happen and he wants to see it. Then we get bodycam of nikki answering the door while patrick is shouting and pacing with clenched autism fists in the background... but they were supposed to walk away assuming there was nothing going on.
This forum is dedicated exclusively to parody, comedy, and satirical content. None of the statements, opinions, or depictions shared on this platform should be considered or treated as factual information under any circumstances. All content is intended for entertainment purposes only and should be regarded as fictional, exaggerated, or purely the result of personal opinions and creative expression.
Please be aware that this forum may feature discussions and content related to taboo, controversial, or potentially offensive subjects. The purpose of this content is not to incite harm but to engage in satire and explore the boundaries of humor. If you are sensitive to such subjects or are easily offended, we kindly advise that you leave the forum.
Any similarities to real people, events, or situations are either coincidental or based on real-life inspirations but used within the context of fair use satire. By accepting this disclaimer, you acknowledge and understand that the content found within this forum is strictly meant for parody, satire, and entertainment. You agree not to hold the forum, its administrators, moderators, or users responsible for any content that may be perceived as offensive or inappropriate. You enter and participate in this forum at your own risk, with full awareness that everything on this platform is purely comedic, satirical, or opinion-based, and should never be taken as factual information.
If any information or discussion on this platform triggers distressing emotions or thoughts, please leave immediately and consider seeking assistance.
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (USA): Phone: 1-800-273-TALK (1-800-273-8255) Website: https://suicidepreventionlifeline.org/