• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

I Wanna See the Courthouse Movie! - Part 3

Slackjawed Cow

I laugh at them because they're all the same.
Forum Clout
268,820
Curious that they latched to the BitChute stuff, which has nothing to do with Quasi, and nothing at all on onaforums.net which is already established it's operated by John Doe 1. I guess they wanted to use the "far right conspiracy theory" bla bla line of narrative? but NOTHING AT ALL from here seems strange, surely if we're as bad as they say they could've found something egregious being said here against the SFWA pedophiles

are they playing the same game as Pat of pretending they don't check our forum? lol hello Pat I know you're reading this, lose some weight fatty
The bitchute stuff never gets brought up or even linked here. What an odd example to choose. I was puzzled why that was included of all the random shit that has been done. None of it having anything to do with money.
 

BudDickman

Forum Clout
41,881
Curious that they latched to the BitChute stuff, which has nothing to do with Quasi, and nothing at all on onaforums.net which is already established it's operated by John Doe 1. I guess they wanted to use the "far right conspiracy theory" bla bla line of narrative? but NOTHING AT ALL from here seems strange, surely if we're as bad as they say they could've found something egregious being said here against the SFWA pedophiles

are they playing the same game as Pat of pretending they don't check our forum? lol hello Pat I know you're reading this, lose some weight fatty
I think it's because linking to the video directly deprives it of context. You can make it seem like whoever posted it is knowingly committing defamation and harassing those poor SFWA members for no reason.
 
G

guest

Guest
There was a public Twitter conversation with Mary Three Names that showed Patrick rejoined SFWA just before the lawsuit was filed; there seemed to be tensions and Patrick was implying he was owed the membership. Sohn, on the other hand, says Patrick has been a member for more than a decade and fails to explain that episode.
It's possible he "joined" for the sole purpose of being the plaintiff in the SFWA's proxy litigation.

Btw, how come BDJ hasn't brought up the SFWA's "grievance committee"? We basically know for certain at this point that that is where Pat got his funding, and that would obviously be a taxable source of income relevant to Pat's finances.
 
G

guest

Guest
Curious that they latched to the BitChute stuff, which has nothing to do with Quasi, and nothing at all on onaforums.net which is already established it's operated by John Doe 1. I guess they wanted to use the "far right conspiracy theory" bla bla line of narrative? but NOTHING AT ALL from here seems strange, surely if we're as bad as they say they could've found something egregious being said here against the SFWA pedophiles

are they playing the same game as Pat of pretending they don't check our forum? lol hello Pat I know you're reading this, lose some weight fatty
Ive mentioned this before but the new judge is a Republican (and runs marathons) so good luck with that sifwa lol
 

FurBurger

What would you do for a Klondike bar?
Forum Clout
22,495
So they're advocating to the court that them being harassed is a reason they shouldn't answer the questions surrounding the subpoena. The SFWA defense strategy is unknown Does harassed them so therefore they get to thumb their noses at Quasi's attempt to collect from Pat. Yep sounds pretty winnable lol.
That sounds like a business opportunity. For a small fee, Boomia can get you out of any subpoena just by repeatedly texting you and calling you an asshole.
 

FurBurger

What would you do for a Klondike bar?
Forum Clout
22,495
"They ask if we "like to suck baby dicks" and are trying to find out if the employee
works here and to talk to them"

well do you?

It's worth noting that when the same accusation was levelled against Pat, he denied them (in his Jun 16th, 2021 declaration in the Cloudflare case):
I am not a pedophile and I have never raped anyone.*

I think it speaks volumes about the SFWA that when they're facing the same accusation, they don't come out and deny it.

*I don't know how much faith I put in his denial; the man's publicly stated both that he's won AND lost his court case against the John Does, and that he does AND doesn't owe Quasi any money. Plus, his refusal to take part in the judgement debtor process appears to me to be in contempt of court. He strikes me as a very unreliable narrator. EDIT: I just found out that the Latin phrase for this is "Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus".
 
Last edited:
Forum Clout
76,456
Predictions for tomorrow?
This is like asking how a guy batting .000 would do against a hall of fame pitcher in his prime. Could he get a hit? It's possible. It's it more likely he'll strike out on 3 straight pitches without even making contact? Definitely.

What I'm saying is Patrick S. Tomlinson is overweight/obese by any medical standard.
 
Top