I Wanna See the Courthouse Movie! - Part 3

[Libby Son Of Loin]

Hersch da ting. Not providing the info would increase the likelihood of them getting harassed anyway, and the easiest way to not get harassed is to totally sell out Patrick.

 

[Kim_Jong_Poon_]

BDJ request:

Sohn modification:

BDJ accepted this form, but when Sohn took it to SFWA for approval they balked at providing a declaration. They were less secure about "reasonable" doing the heavy lifting. ("In connection with its search" hinges on Sohn's "reasonable" search rather than BDJ's "all [...] information [...] responsive to the subpoena.")

BDJ noted his client wondered why the declaration that records were diligently searched is difficult to produce without a protective order. (Sohn now absurdly claims any SFWA officer signing it might face harassment. All SFWA officers are listed on their website AFAIK.)

It seems Sohn expected to exploit the proposed declaration's "reasonable" technicality by skipping categories of documents he doesn't like. After all, Sohn argues in the latest Reply that "The Subpoena is overbroad on its face. It seeks records containing information that go well beyond Mr. Tomlinson’s finances and assets." Sohn goes on to characterize what he supposedly diligently searched as "uncalled for [...] sensitive [...] not relevant [...] say nothing [...] would not reveal [...] egregious [...] improper fishing expedition [...] How is this demand “tailored” [...] no justifiable grounds."

I still can't wrap my head around the fact that the SFWA are unable to provide a copy of payment from Pat to the SFWA for union dues. Especially if Pat's doing revolving annual transactions on his card. I'm not an accountant and I've never really worked in accounting, but I understand that any basic accounting software can pull a copy of a transaction. At the minimum they can get it from a credit card processing merchant. I'm curious if Jen brings this up and how/if Sohn can explain it.

 

[NoBacon]

Also I guess the SFWA never did pay Pat, they presumably just got invoiced the legal costs on his behalf

 

[Cuphead]

I still can't wrap my head around the fact that the SFWA are unable to provide a copy of payment from Pat to the SFWA for union dues. Especially if Pat's doing revolving annual transactions on his card. I'm not an accountant and I've never really worked in accounting, but I understand that any basic accounting software can pull a copy of a transaction. At the minimum they can get it from a credit card processing merchant. I'm curious if Jen brings this up and how/if Sohn can explain it.

I trust Jerry isn't going to go down without a fight

 

[Libby Son Of Loin]

Also I guess the SFWA never did pay Pat, they presumably just got invoiced the legal costs on his behalf

Unless they're constantly wiping their history to cover up traces of pedophilia

 

[Stent]

Anthony Cumia is in BLATANT DENIAL about being a PEDOPHILE

It's good to see, even as the case wears on, they're still remembering what's important.

 

[Mike Glyer]

Also I guess the SFWA never did pay Pat, they presumably just got invoiced the legal costs on his behalf

But I would have to assume this opens them up to become liable for paying Quasi's judgement. Otherwise, you could just have rich people fund bullshit lawsuits and bankrupt defendents over 1st Amendment issues. That's exactly what anti-SLAPP laws are designed to prevent.

 

[DanMullen'sRetardedNephew]

My fucking ribs
View attachment 42185

I'm not a lawyer, but it is such a weird fucking legal response.

JJ: We need your financial info about Pat.
SFWA: Look at this bitchute account!

It's a complete non-sequitur.

 

[Lamont & Tonelli]

Why are all the women in the patverse built like wild pigs?

 

[guest]

I still can't wrap my head around the fact that the SFWA are unable to provide a copy of payment from Pat to the SFWA for union dues. Especially if Pat's doing revolving annual transactions on his card. I'm not an accountant and I've never really worked in accounting, but I understand that any basic accounting software can pull a copy of a transaction. At the minimum they can get it from a credit card processing merchant. I'm curious if Jen brings this up and how/if Sohn can explain it.

Pure speculation, but maybe they inducted Patrick for free at some point - being a special boy. If the transaction actually happened after 2020 (within the main scope of the subpoena), their registration process maybe had a step where the system needed the card info either set or updated, so they just recorded the updated card info, did a test transaction or manually returned an actual payment made.

That said, Sohn never outright mentions the date or context of the AMEX card info, so it can very well predate 2020 while still being active membership information on Patrick's profile or whatever.

There was a public Twitter conversation with Mary Three Names that showed Patrick rejoined SFWA just before the lawsuit was filed; there seemed to be tensions and Patrick was implying he was owed the membership. Sohn, on the other hand, says Patrick has been a member for more than a decade and fails to explain that episode.

So it's possible that he was just switched as a member internally without needing to pay dues after previously ragelapsing because he didn't feel SFWA was doing enough for his internet persona. There's no shortage of ballwashers around.

 

[SFWA liaison]

that lady is a real hog, no wonder they get ads for blood pressure medication at the law firm


I don't trust the pedos with the whole confidentiality deal because they can then go ahead an leak the very same documents here or on the farms and use that to go after de-anonymization of Quasi because he'd be "the only conceivable person" to have done it.

 

[Kim_Jong_Poon_]

Pure speculation, but maybe they inducted Patrick for free at some point - being a special boy. If the transaction actually happened after 2020 (within the main scope of the subpoena), their registration process maybe had a step where the system needed the card info either set or updated, so they just recorded the updated card info, did a test transaction or manually returned an actual payment made.

That said, Sohn never outright mentions the date or context of the AMEX card info, so it can very well predate 2020 while still being active membership information on Patrick's profile or whatever.

There was a public Twitter conversation with Mary Three Names that showed Patrick rejoined SFWA just before the lawsuit was filed; there seemed to be tensions and Patrick was implying he was owed the membership. Sohn, on the other hand, says Patrick has been a member for more than a decade and fails to explain that episode.

So it's possible that he was just switched as a member internally without needing to pay dues after previously ragelapsing because he didn't feel SFWA was doing enough for his internet persona. There's no shortage of ballwashers around.

I understand your speculation, but I read their membership rules https://www.sfwa.org/about/join-us/sfwa-membership-requirements/

I'm not looking at their bylaws here, but unions can't typically go 'naw, he's cool. Let him in'.. It's not like a treehouse

 

[guest]

I'm not a lawyer, but it is such a weird fucking legal response.

JJ: We need your financial info about Pat.
SFWA: Look at this bitchute account!

It's a complete non-sequitur.

Jen is really bending Sohn over a table a fucking him up that ass with his huge 7.5-inch Asian cock.

The judge's eyes must glaze over when the Bitchute/Adam Rakunas stuff comes up because it's so unrelated to the matter. It seems like a total admission that Sohn's not confident.

 

[Harry Powell]

I’d be pissed if my lawyer was more concerned with his 12-point inspection or whatever instead of my case. Velly unplofessionar!

 

[guest]

Do we know yet if Thursday will be online?

 

[BudDickman]

I like how Sohn didn't crop out the irrelevant "Inflation Bidenflation" banner to drive the point home that bitchute is an alt-right platform.

 

[Slackjawed Cow]

Jen is really bending Sohn over a table a fucking him up that ass with his huge 7.5-inch Asian cock.

The judge's eyes must glaze over when the Bitchute/Adam Rakunas stuff comes up because it's so unrelated to the matter. It seems like a total admission that Sohn's not confident.

Good point. Jen wants to arrange quasis payment and it requires not just their payment history. He doesnt give a shit about what we think or want. Im sure there are a few people getting financial requests in order to resolve this since pat is refusing a court order to pay. Us laughing about it is just a byproduct of their frivolous failed lawsuit.

They are so worried about what a few rascals think. If everything is on the up and up then their books should show his $100 annual payment and thats pretty much it. If they were secretly funding a shifty $100k lawsuit that has pats financials tied to a contract. Then Jen will need to factor all that into his report and there might be some taxes owed to the IRS on someones end for that amount of money changing hands.

Either way Jen is there for just a small part of his case that he is building. Its not all aimed at the SFWA specifically. Pats publishers will need to provide what they pay pat also and so on. They are so caught up thinking its a personal attack when its just routine debtor collections from a legal stand point.

 

[guest]

Good point. Jen wants to arrange quasis payment and it requires not just their payment history. He doesnt give a shit about what we think or want. Im sure there are a few people getting financial requests in order to resolve this since pat is refusing a court order to pay. Us laughing about it is just a byproduct of their frivolous failed lawsuit.

They are so worried about what a few rascals think. If everything is on the up and up then their books should show his $100 annual payment and thats pretty much it. If they were secretly funding a shifty $100k lawsuit that has pats financials tied to a contract. Then Jen will need to factor all that into his report and there might be some taxes owed to the IRS on someones end for that amount of money changing hands.

Either way Jen is there for just a small part of his case that he is building. Its not all aimed at the SFWA specifically. Pats publishers will need to provide what they pay pat also and so on. They are so caught up thinking its a personal attack when its just routine debtor collections from a legal stand point.

It's been so confusing to me too. Pat had a madeup address for the lolsuit. Like the address didn't exist.

Pat owes 37k but we should be paying him for this entertainment. It's like our own HBOMax series.

 

[guest]

Can they use the Josiah tapes of Rick admitting that "an organization that I am a member of" was helping him? Or even Starship Fonzie or whatever the fuck that guy's name is saying that the SFWA bankrolled it, though that might be hearsay.

ThaT doesn’T maTTER, Judge liTTle one.

 

[SFWA liaison]

Curious that they latched to the BitChute stuff, which has nothing to do with Quasi, and nothing at all on onaforums.net which is already established it's operated by John Doe 1. I guess they wanted to use the "far right conspiracy theory" bla bla line of narrative? but NOTHING AT ALL from here seems strange, surely if we're as bad as they say they could've found something egregious being said here against the SFWA pedophiles

are they playing the same game as Pat of pretending they don't check our forum? lol hello Pat I know you're reading this, lose some weight fatty