I Wanna See the Courthouse Movie! - Part 3

[guest]

[URL='https://ibb.co/N7hRDW0']

[/URL]

Fawkkkk

 

[DanMullen'sRetardedNephew]

That stinks. Wonder what JJ's next move will be?

 

[Cuphead]

So is there still going to be a hearing tomorrow for Jerry to argue against this?

 

[Kim_Jong_Poon_]

Fucking bullshit. I hope Jen can go to court and show that they're lying about not being able to retrieve transactions between Pat and the SFWA. Otherwise Doe 1 is SOL here

@notalawyer - comment?

 

[Kim_Jong_Poon_]

So is there still going to be a hearing tomorrow for Jerry to argue against this?

Yes, Jen will have a chance to challenge the tentative ruling

 

[Cuphead]

Yes, Jen will have a chance to challenge the tentative ruling

FAWK this is going to be a nail bitter isn't it?

 

[guest]

Predictions for tomorrow?

Hilarity. I’m a useless underemployed semi alcoholic who knows dick about streaming so I hope one of you brothamen is able to upload this for posterity and to correcT The record.

 

[Harry Powell]

$5000 for those pedos? Not a fawkin chance. BDJJ better get some of Peña’s performance powder before this fawkin’ hearing and show up to FAWKIN’ play

 

[Cuphead]

Hilarity. I’m a useless underemployed semi alcoholic who knows dick about streaming so I hope one of you brothamen is able to upload this for posterity and to correcT The record.

I hope Jerry brings the Josiah tapes. My ribs would never recover if he was allowed to use those in court.

 

[JoeCumiaDotCom]

I don't think it's very realistic but fingers crossed that Jerry can pull a wild card and produce the clip of Fatty saying "an organization I'm a member of" is footing his legal bills. Quasi may have lost this battle, but he won the war. Patrick still owes him a bunch of money.

 

[guest]

Fucking bullshit. I hope Jen can go to court and show that they're lying about not being able to retrieve transactions between Pat and the SFWA. Otherwise Doe 1 is SOL here

@notalawyer - comment?

It’s a tentative ruling by a Pro tem. I would assume Jerry objected, so that means he would appear tomorrow. Since the ruling is contested it goes to the presiding judge at a later date. Probably 30-60 days out.


It appears the pro tem did not actually read the response just the initial motion to quash. The tentative is a mess for a lot of reasons. We’ll see what Jerry says tomorrow to straighten things out. The judge is certainly confused.

If the meet and confer is deficient then there wouldn't be sanctions issued. Purriod. This is embarrassingly bad. Jerry provided the justification with case law, which he says Jerry didn't. I'm... not even sure what the pro tem was reading... It's just delaying the actual ruling, so we get another hearing to watch out of it.

~not a lawyer~~

 

[Joe_Cumia_Eats_HUMAN_SHIT]

^^^We always win

 

[Kim_Jong_Poon_]

It appears the pro tem did not actually read the response just the initial motion to quash. The tentative is a mess for a lot of reasons. We’ll see what Jerry says tomorrow to straighten things out. The judge is certainly confused.

~not a lawyer~~

He should've asked his teenage son about it

 

[VoodooChild]

^^^We always win

#DLTIW

 

[Dummy Gaynuts]

can't a judge just cut pat's micro penis off or something

 

[JoeCumiawearsDIAPERS]

That stinks. Wonder what JJ's next move will be?

I’m Not a lawyer but here’s my read on this bitch.

It’s preliminary so JJ has the chance to argue his case. To me, it’s a matter of determining if Jerry and Doe 1 feel it’s is in their best interests to proceed with arguing their case.

Basically, Quasi needs to decide if he wants to go the Patrick route of doubling down and possibly compounding his losses or cutting it off to limit the damage. This is the Judge Stein hearing equivalent of the process.

It was an uphill battle from the start because the burden of proof is on Jerry and Quasi. All the virgins at SFWA need to do is discredit and deflect well enough to get it tossed.

At the end of the day, the courts have ruled Patrick owes money and this doesn’t change that. All it means is Jerry can’t crowbar the SFWA’s books at this time.

WWAW starting an anonymous donation thing to back Quasi up for being the realest ass dude of all time?

 

[guest]

I’m Not a lawyer but here’s my read on this bitch.

It’s preliminary so JJ has the chance to argue his case. To me, it’s a matter of determining if Jerry and Doe 1 feel it’s is in their best interests to proceed with arguing their case.

Basically, Quasi needs to decide if he wants to go the Patrick route of doubling down and possibly compounding his losses or cutting it off to limit the damage. This is the Judge Stein hearing equivalent of the process.

It was an uphill battle from the start because the burden of proof is on Jerry and Quasi. All the virgins at SFWA need to do is discredit and deflect well enough to get it tossed.

At the end of the day, the courts have ruled Patrick owes money and this doesn’t change that. All it means is Jerry can’t crowbar the SFWA’s books at this time.

WWAW starting an anonymous donation thing to back Quasi up for being the realest ass dude of all time?

The pro tem's tentative is so egregiously incorrect you can't read anything into it. It will be interesting to see what he says once Jerry explains everything he literally put in his response. But assuming Jerry objected properly, this goes before the real judge anyway. It's not an uphill battle, Quasi is entitled to everything in the subpoena. Jerry made the case in his subpoena and response. The pro tem didn't read it.

Read Jerry's response again. It is very clear.

 

[BakersfieldChimp]

I’m Not a lawyer but here’s my read on this bitch.

It’s preliminary so JJ has the chance to argue his case. To me, it’s a matter of determining if Jerry and Doe 1 feel it’s is in their best interests to proceed with arguing their case.

Basically, Quasi needs to decide if he wants to go the Patrick route of doubling down and possibly compounding his losses or cutting it off to limit the damage. This is the Judge Stein hearing equivalent of the process.

It was an uphill battle from the start because the burden of proof is on Jerry and Quasi. All the virgins at SFWA need to do is discredit and deflect well enough to get it tossed.

At the end of the day, the courts have ruled Patrick owes money and this doesn’t change that. All it means is Jerry can’t crowbar the SFWA’s books at this time.

WWAW starting an anonymous donation thing to back Quasi up for being the realest ass dude of all time?

I'm not sure how much we could raise but I'm down for some anonymous funding.

 

[SmellenShoehorn]

The pro tem's tentative is so egregiously incorrect you can't read anything into it. It will be interesting to see what he says once Jerry explains everything he literally put in his response. But assuming Jerry objected properly, this goes before the real judge anyway. It's not an uphill battle, Quasi is entitled to everything in the subpoena Jerry made the case in his subpoena and response. The pro tem didn't read it.

If JJ says "you did noT read iT, your honor" I'll suck his huge Asian (read: average) dick

 

[guest]

It’s a tentative ruling by a Pro tem. I would assume Jerry objected, so that means he would appear tomorrow. Since the ruling is contested it goes to the presiding judge at a later date. Probably 30-60 days out.


It appears the pro tem did not actually read the response just the initial motion to quash. The tentative is a mess for a lot of reasons. We’ll see what Jerry says tomorrow to straighten things out. The judge is certainly confused.

If the meet and confer is deficient then there wouldn't be sanctions issued. Purriod. This is embarrassingly bad. Jerry provided the justification with case law, which he says Jerry didn't. I'm... not even sure what the pro tem was reading... It's just delaying the actual ruling, so we get another hearing to watch out of it.

~not a lawyer~~

Question. Say worst case Quasi has to pay SFWAs legal fees, is it possible that gets billed to Pat as part of the collection? So Quasi pays 5K and then Pat's debt goes up 5k, it's not his fault that they have to throw darts to get compliance with the judgement against Pat. I can't understand why a good faith collection attempt against a guy might not ensnare people you suspect wrongly and they shouldn't have to pay their own fees, but the party responsible for all of this is Pat, so can this eventually be collected off of him if Quasi pays SFWA's fees?