- Forum Clout
- 11,261
Could they be held liable for the defense attorneys? Any precedent?May have been said already but this is probably with a lawyer that is not charging if they lose, but gets a larger cut if they win.
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
Could they be held liable for the defense attorneys? Any precedent?May have been said already but this is probably with a lawyer that is not charging if they lose, but gets a larger cut if they win.
Exactly, they are doing their job because if they didn’t take a call seriously and blew it off and something did happen they would be in trouble. They are suing the MPD because they didn’t create and implement a new special procedure related to them and how police departments all over the country need to start making procedures related to “swatting”Completely absent any of our evidence, the cops have a duty to treat all emergency calls as legitimate. Even the most "damning" part of their suit, where the cop says he is "fully aware" that he is being swatted, he is still perfectly within his legal right to search the Robinson-Tomlinson household when a call is made claiming that Pat has just murdered his wife.
If the city settles while Pat still hasn’t paid his second, better debt would Quasi be entitled to take what he’s owed off the top of whatever Piggy Boy gets from the city?If he has to take the stand he will be so sidetracked trying to talk about this place.
Imagine suing the city for police doing their jobs. I really hope they dont settle out of court. This is all a cash grab. Cant pay quasi so they sue the city in hopes of a settlement.
I would assume so.If the city settles while Pat still hasn’t paid his second, better debt would Quasi be entitled to take what he’s owed off the top of whatever Piggy Boy gets from the city?
I'm going to go with 2A. The city decides to settle for like $50,000-75,000 (wild guess). This would be a great deal for Pat. But Pat is stubborn and stupid and refuses to accept the settlement. So it goes to trial and Pat loses, getting no money but owing his new attorneys money.
At least, that's my on-the-record prediction. Reading the whole document, it's pretty obvious that no serious attorney gave Pat and Niki the time of day on this ridiculous case, so they had to settle for an attorney stupid enough to actually put his name at the end of this foolish lawsuit. Anyone competent would be embarrassed to write their client is a victim of domestic terrorism at the hands of online "bullies" while providing literally zero evidence to support that claim.
47. When he got home, Patrick was illegally detained by the officers who threatened to place him in handcuffs for trying to go inside his own home. 48. The very next day, April 12, 2023, Sergeant Evans responded to a false 911 call at their home and told Niki and Patrick that he would kick down their door if they did not open it so he could look inside. 49. By trespassing on Niki and Patrick’s porch and threatening to kick down their door, Sergeant Evans conducted an illegal search.
This is not how you use italics in a legal document. When you cite other cases or sometimes latin phrases . .ribs but . .you don't do it to put emotional emphasis on a key phrase. That's for jury argument . .lol. this fucking asshole. I'm dying.
“Rushed home” - drove drunkOh he really made a scene on that visit. Gotta see those bodycams. He was drunk and in full tough guy mode. This might be one of his better meltdowns if it ever gets released.
The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution requires police officers to have a warrant before performing a search, or entering someone’s home. However, if an officer has reason to believe there is an emergency occurring inside that is endangering a person there, or that evidence is being destroyed, he may enter, after announcing himself, without a warrant. To explore this concept, consider the following exigent circumstance definition.
He will try to make his stock jokes on the stand ("I'm not 25 and don't close out bars") and be sternly reminded to answer the question. This will make him seethe.Patrick will absolutely testify and "no, child" during cross examination.
It's a long shot but there's a chance that clips of Josiah 5 will be playing in court on the record.
This season is going to be EPIC
I’d sure like to see the police report about when the gun and joke book were stolen.Which means they are not gonna be fighting too hard.
when evidence of pigs behaviour comes to their attention it may fizzle out.
So boys whats back on the menu for 2024?
Its probably in SGT Evans best interest to show that pig vastly over exaggerates everything or outright lies:
pull up the peperronigate files. lets compare that to pats report of that night.
all the bodycams of the swattings and see how pats description compares
lets check whether tomtom and raven were swatted three times (or was this another fable to make a narrative)
lets check out that gas cutoff lie that pat has claimed in every media interview.
penguicon bomb threat
brewers opening game bomb threat
if this goes to trial its gonna be a goldmine of information
I absolutely NEED the Pigman on the stand. There's no way he can control himself to not spergout.He will try to make his stock jokes on the stand ("I'm not 25 and don't close out bars") and be sternly reminded to answer the question. This will make him seethe.
I don't have the post but we know the papers for the rest of the money were mailed weeks ago.I really thought things were winding down with the Pat saga. That everyone was riding out the last bit of quasis collection of money and it would go stagnant. Now Pat is diving snout first into another legal battle this time involving the city of milwaukee since he failed suing quasi and torswats is a 17 year old sperg that only has pokemon cards to his name. Plenty of people thought this might happen.
I bet he got served more collections papers from Jerry and it pushed them over the edge to finally file since they dont have the cash for this next round. Purely speculating obviously.
You know who talks like that...LMAO "bullies" what a fucking faggot
I bet this lawsuit is his plan to pay back Lynne for paying Quasi. She loaned them the money and I bet was told it will all work out once they sue the city.I really thought things were winding down with the Pat saga. That everyone was riding out the last bit of quasis collection of money and it would go stagnant. Now Pat is diving snout first into another legal battle this time involving the city of milwaukee since he failed suing quasi and torswats is a 17 year old sperg that only has pokemon cards to his name. Plenty of people thought this might happen.
I bet he got served more collections papers from Jerry and it pushed them over the edge to finally file since they dont have the cash for this next round. Purely speculating obviously.
It’s because “meanies” doesn’t have the same sting as criminal bullies.
This forum is dedicated exclusively to parody, comedy, and satirical content. None of the statements, opinions, or depictions shared on this platform should be considered or treated as factual information under any circumstances. All content is intended for entertainment purposes only and should be regarded as fictional, exaggerated, or purely the result of personal opinions and creative expression.
Please be aware that this forum may feature discussions and content related to taboo, controversial, or potentially offensive subjects. The purpose of this content is not to incite harm but to engage in satire and explore the boundaries of humor. If you are sensitive to such subjects or are easily offended, we kindly advise that you leave the forum.
Any similarities to real people, events, or situations are either coincidental or based on real-life inspirations but used within the context of fair use satire. By accepting this disclaimer, you acknowledge and understand that the content found within this forum is strictly meant for parody, satire, and entertainment. You agree not to hold the forum, its administrators, moderators, or users responsible for any content that may be perceived as offensive or inappropriate. You enter and participate in this forum at your own risk, with full awareness that everything on this platform is purely comedic, satirical, or opinion-based, and should never be taken as factual information.
If any information or discussion on this platform triggers distressing emotions or thoughts, please leave immediately and consider seeking assistance.
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (USA): Phone: 1-800-273-TALK (1-800-273-8255) Website: https://suicidepreventionlifeline.org/