You didn't listen closely to the last hearing....Quasi gets nothing.

[guest]

I think not in Cali, when it is quashed he has to pay the lawyer fees. At least this is what I understand from El Tigres filings.
Then again, 16 dick about law etc.

It seems to say that it is automatic, which would act act as deterrent to people filing suits and actions just to force others to defend at a cost.

 

[CarolMaxheinie]

Not an attorney, but I can run it past my counsel. I read the Cali regs and it appears to be automatic and not discretionary based on the judge; however, there may be other rules that aren’t apparent to a simple country chemical engineer like me.

 

[guest]

Not an attorney, but I can run it past my counsel. I read the Cali regs and it appears to be automatic and not discretionary based on the judge; however, there may be other rules that aren’t apparent to a simple country chemical engineer like me.

Chemical engineer, what poisons have a very short half life and don't dilute in beer, asking for a friend writing a sci-fi novel, think DOA in space, with transsexual ants who are 5 feet tall, and child looking prostitutes that are elderly in chronological age.

 

[Patrick S Tomlinson]

Not an attorney, but I can run it past my counsel. I read the Cali regs and it appears to be automatic and not discretionary based on the judge; however, there may be other rules that aren’t apparent to a simple country chemical engineer like me.

Pouring half empty detergent bottles into a new one doesn't make you a chemical engineer, child. Hush now.

 

[Harry Powell]

Pouring half empty detergent bottles into a new one doesn't make you a chemical engineer, child. Hush now.

That avatar is fucking gold

 

[CarolMaxheinie]

Chemical engineer, what poisons have a very short half life and don't dilute in beer, asking for a friend writing a sci-fi novel, think DOA in space, with transsexual ants who are 5 feet tall, and child looking prostitutes that are elderly in chronological age.

If you’re trying to poison a fat loser (in Minecraft), the most effective substance would be “his daughter’s love”. He’s highly allergic to it.

 

[guest]

If you’re trying to poison a fat loser (in Minecraft), the most effective substance would be “his daughter’s love”. He’s highly allergic to it.

Oafa, hope he lurks here.

 

[guest]

Not an attorney, but I can run it past my counsel. I read the Cali regs and it appears to be automatic and not discretionary based on the judge; however, there may be other rules that aren’t apparent to a simple country chemical engineer like me.

i too, am not a lawyer. Here's what the original sanctions claim was in the first quash document

[url=https://ibb.co/ZHNd0CR]

[/url]
[url=https://ibb.co/2S8fsfC]

[/url]


[URL unfurl="true"]https://codes.findlaw.com/ca/code-of-civil-procedure/ccp-sect-1987-2.html[/URL]

(a) Except as specified in subdivision (c), in making an order pursuant to motion made under [URL='https://1.next.westlaw.com/Link/Document/FullText?findType=L&originatingContext=document&transitionType=DocumentItem&pubNum=1000201&refType=SP&originatingDoc=I9be2e9e01a0c11e99e829a5cf7a657e4&cite=CACPS1987']subdivision (c) of Section 1987[/URL] or under [URL='https://1.next.westlaw.com/Link/Document/FullText?findType=L&originatingContext=document&transitionType=DocumentItem&pubNum=1000201&refType=LQ&originatingDoc=I9be2e9e11a0c11e99e829a5cf7a657e4&cite=CACPS1987.1']Section 1987.1[/URL] , the court may in its discretion award the amount of the reasonable expenses incurred in making or opposing the motion, including reasonable attorney's fees, if the court finds the motion was made or opposed in bad faith or without substantial justification or that one or more of the requirements of the subpoena was oppressive.
(b)(1) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), absent exceptional circumstances, the court shall not impose sanctions on a subpoenaed person or the attorney of a subpoenaed person for failure to provide electronically stored information that has been lost, damaged, altered, or overwritten as the result of the routine, good faith operation of an electronic information system.

(2) This subdivision shall not be construed to alter any obligation to preserve discoverable information.
(c) If a motion is filed under [URL='https://1.next.westlaw.com/Link/Document/FullText?findType=L&originatingContext=document&transitionType=DocumentItem&pubNum=1000201&refType=LQ&originatingDoc=I9be338021a0c11e99e829a5cf7a657e4&cite=CACPS1987.1']Section 1987.1[/URL] for an order to quash or modify a subpoena from a court of this state for personally identifying information, as defined in [URL='https://1.next.westlaw.com/Link/Document/FullText?findType=L&originatingContext=document&transitionType=DocumentItem&pubNum=1000200&refType=SP&originatingDoc=I9be338001a0c11e99e829a5cf7a657e4&cite=CACIS1798.79.8']subdivision (b) of Section 1798.79.8 of the Civil Code[/URL] , for use in an action pending in another state, territory, or district of the United States, or in a foreign nation, and that subpoena has been served on any Internet service provider, or on the provider of any other interactive computer service, as defined in [URL='https://1.next.westlaw.com/Link/Document/FullText?findType=L&originatingContext=document&transitionType=DocumentItem&pubNum=1000546&refType=SP&originatingDoc=I9be338011a0c11e99e829a5cf7a657e4&cite=47USCAS230']Section 230(f)(2) of Title 47 of the United States Code[/URL] , if the moving party prevails, and if the underlying action arises from the moving party's exercise of free speech rights on the Internet and the respondent has failed to make a prima facie showing of a cause of action, the court shall award the amount of the reasonable expenses incurred in making the motion, including reasonable attorney's fees.

The discretion would seem to be if the claim is about free speech or not. And if 2(c) applies. Its directly tied to free speech and trying to obtain personal information, so it would seem that if any other statutes applies, it would defeat the purpose of this being a deterrent against using lawsuits to get that info.

Defense's attorney claims it is mandatory.

~~ not a lawyer~~

 

[Clint Ruin]

Not an attorney, but I can run it past my counsel. I read the Cali regs and it appears to be automatic and not discretionary based on the judge; however, there may be other rules that aren’t apparent to a simple country chemical engineer like me.

Lard ass can still declare bankruptcy to get out of paying shit. Ain't gonna do his credit any favors, but neither will being in the hook for Quashi quashing. That's actually probably the closest thing to a win he could get, burning himself financially just to burn Quasi financially. Just a down payment on the book sales and gig payouts when he's an expert cyberstalking pundit for CNN

 

[BonnieMcFarlaneMe2]

Good burn, I guess, but more importantly; can you tell me what the over/under is for Saturday's Illinois/Virginia game?

Over 12 beers and 4,000 calories.

 

[BonnieMcFarlaneMe2]

Its the law that if this is quashed that he automatically owes quasi.
It's not up for debate, it's the law.

He knows this. He is loying his usual outlandish and easily disprovable loys.

See: my mother's name isn't raven, I don't have traffic court, I never said I would kill myself over Adrienne, I never said I missed Adrienne on video.. we could do this all day

“I had a barrel in my mouth.” I’m inclined to agree with Piggy because it’s fairly likely that he could have been talking about a dick.

 

[CarolMaxheinie]

…Ain't gonna do his credit any favors…

He’s massively in debt and massive in his tits and gut. I doubt his credit is a concern to him.

 

[Uncle Anthony Cumia]

I’m glad I didn’t see that ad before Louisiana played Texas last weekend. Thought the Ragin Cajuns were a sure thing.

 

[fenrir]

“I had a barrel in my mouth.” I’m inclined to agree with Piggy because it’s fairly likely that he could have been talking about a dick.

I thought he meant one of these barrels:

But you're right. It's most likely dick.