This is the ideal idiot. You may not like it, but this is what peak stupidity looks like.

[Prison Enjoyer]

Can’t tell if you mean GypsyCrusader (looks like a faggot) or Catboy Cammie (is a faggot)

The only funny “calling everyone a nigger” streamer was CodComedyTJ. Kneeling on NIGGER George Floyd’s neck was an all-timer.

The bitchute channel “based blunts” is the full archive of his stuff.

 

[Grindset Alpha King]

How do you not just bully this guy until suicide for saying half the country is fascists?

 

[Juschippinyababe]

The only funny “calling everyone a nigger” streamer was CodComedyTJ. Kneeling on NIGGER George Floyd’s neck was an all-timer.

The bitchute channel “based blunts” is the full archive of his stuff.

I was a dedicated codcomedytj fan during lockdowns that shit was hilarious. Someone posted shit that hes a total wimp now after the bongistan police got at him

 

[O-BLOCK NIGGA!]

The inherent idea with the Left's perception of Trans people is that when they argue for the existence of Trans, they argue as if these people want to be "left alone" to come to terms with their identity. Almost like they're advocating for the "don't tread on me" Libertarian stance concerning Trans identities.

Here's the problem with that:

We KNOW the Woke/Left's positions on Power (reality is only real based on who's wielding power because that's the driving force in all of reality, and if 7 billion people believed that X is Y, then X is now magically Y), and we KNOW their positions on ALL relationships between people (as being some variety of oppressor/oppressed, ingroup/outgroup). It is highly likely that if you're Trans, you are on the Left.

Therefore, based on what we've all observed from the Left (that is listed above); we cannot expect Trannies to NOT be groomers in all (or most) situations, since trooning more kids and obscuring the lines between Men and Women would align with their worldview and causes. More Trans people means the terms that define Men and Women become more diluted, and more people are positioned against the perceived ingroup, or bourgeoisie (Cisgenders). More unnecessary, irreversible surgeries on the young and old, more people pushed towards just being Trans (if they happen to be a masculine girl or feminine boy), and more casualties of permanently altered lives just to fill up the ranks. This is why I normally say that the activists don't want happy Trans people; they just want MORE Trans people.

For the groomer tag to not be relevant, you would need more Trans people going off and living their lives without trying to influence anyone down their path. If they were sought out by someone younger for guidance, then that Trans person would have a responsibility to be upfront about the dangers of all the surgeries and medications that came with being Trans so that this kid could see both the benefits and drawbacks (it would also be a big responsibility for medical practitioners to do this too). Not to dissuade the kid but to fully inform them of what they're in for, and where they may regret their decisions, Gender Dysphoria aside...

If you advocate for any kind of Trans-ness or gender-affirming surgery, and you DON'T talk about its trade-offs, byproducts, or risks AT ALL...then you are a fucking groomer. Simple as.

 

[Torque’sHeadBump]

The inherent idea with the Left's perception of Trans people is that when they argue for the existence of Trans, they argue as if these people want to be "left alone" to come to terms with their identity. Almost like they're advocating for the "don't tread on me" Libertarian stance concerning Trans identities.

Here's the problem with that:

We KNOW the Woke/Left's positions on Power (reality is only real based on who's wielding power because that's the driving force in all of reality, and if 7 billion people believed that X is Y, then X is now magically Y), and we KNOW their positions on ALL relationships between people (as being some variety of oppressor/oppressed, ingroup/outgroup). It is highly likely that if you're Trans, you are on the Left.

Therefore, based on the factual statements above, we cannot expect Trannies to NOT be groomers in all (or most) situations, since trooning more kids and obscuring the lines between Men and Women would align with their worldview and causes in the real world. More Trans people means the terms that define Men and Women become more diluted, and more people are positioned against the perceived ingroup, or bourgeoisie (Cisgenders). More unnecessary, irreversible surgeries on the young and old, more people pushed towards just being Trans (if they happen to be a masculine girl or feminine boy), and more casualties of permanently altered lives just to fill up the ranks. This is why I normally say that the activists don't want happy Trans people; they just want MORE Trans people.

For the groomer tag to not be relevant, you would need more Trans people going off and living their lives without trying to influence anyone down their path. If they were sought out by someone younger for guidance, then that Trans person would have a responsibility to be upfront about the dangers of all the surgeries and medications that came with being Trans so that this kid could see both the benefits and drawbacks (it would also be a big responsibility for medical practitioners to do this too). Not to dissuade the kid but to fully inform them of what they're in for, and where they may regret their decisions, Gender Dysphoria aside...

If you advocate for any kind of Trans-ness or gender-affirming surgery, and you DON'T talk about its trade-offs, byproducts, or risks AT ALL...then you are a fucking groomer. Simple as.

Ty for keeping it brief, brothaman

 

[Agent Smith]

The inherent idea with the Left's perception of Trans people is that when they argue for the existence of Trans, they argue as if these people want to be "left alone" to come to terms with their identity. Almost like they're advocating for the "don't tread on me" Libertarian stance concerning Trans identities.

Here's the problem with that:

We KNOW the Woke/Left's positions on Power (reality is only real based on who's wielding power because that's the driving force in all of reality, and if 7 billion people believed that X is Y, then X is now magically Y), and we KNOW their positions on ALL relationships between people (as being some variety of oppressor/oppressed, ingroup/outgroup). It is highly likely that if you're Trans, you are on the Left.

Therefore, based on the factual statements above, we cannot expect Trannies to NOT be groomers in all (or most) situations, since trooning more kids and obscuring the lines between Men and Women would align with their worldview and causes in the real world. More Trans people means the terms that define Men and Women become more diluted, and more people are positioned against the perceived ingroup, or bourgeoisie (Cisgenders). More unnecessary, irreversible surgeries on the young and old, more people pushed towards just being Trans (if they happen to be a masculine girl or feminine boy), and more casualties of permanently altered lives just to fill up the ranks. This is why I normally say that the activists don't want happy Trans people; they just want MORE Trans people.

For the groomer tag to not be relevant, you would need more Trans people going off and living their lives without trying to influence anyone down their path. If they were sought out by someone younger for guidance, then that Trans person would have a responsibility to be upfront about the dangers of all the surgeries and medications that came with being Trans so that this kid could see both the benefits and drawbacks (it would also be a big responsibility for medical practitioners to do this too). Not to dissuade the kid but to fully inform them of what they're in for, and where they may regret their decisions, Gender Dysphoria aside...

If you advocate for any kind of Trans-ness or gender-affirming surgery, and you DON'T talk about its trade-offs, byproducts, or risks AT ALL...then you are a fucking groomer. Simple as.

damn nigga

 

[O-BLOCK NIGGA!]

Ty for keeping it brief, brothaman
View attachment 227600

Lol

 

[O-BLOCK NIGGA!]

damn nigga

thats how it be.

 

[Josef Kuminski]

How do you not just bully this guy until suicide for saying half the country is fascists?

Lolcows like Rick are impervious to suicide. Their ego won’t allow it, the genuinely believe the world needs them. People that are suicidal are in psychic pain to the point they think ending their life ends the pain. Rick is a bottomless pit of cope and delusions. He could be living in a cardboard box without Susan and he’d still think he is gods gift to the world.

 

[damitjenkins20cars]

after the bongistan police got at him

Did he have a loiscence?

 

[Harry Powell]

The inherent idea with the Left's perception of Trans people is that when they argue for the existence of Trans, they argue as if these people want to be "left alone" to come to terms with their identity. Almost like they're advocating for the "don't tread on me" Libertarian stance concerning Trans identities.

Here's the problem with that:

We KNOW the Woke/Left's positions on Power (reality is only real based on who's wielding power because that's the driving force in all of reality, and if 7 billion people believed that X is Y, then X is now magically Y), and we KNOW their positions on ALL relationships between people (as being some variety of oppressor/oppressed, ingroup/outgroup). It is highly likely that if you're Trans, you are on the Left.

Therefore, based on the factual statements above, we cannot expect Trannies to NOT be groomers in all (or most) situations, since trooning more kids and obscuring the lines between Men and Women would align with their worldview and causes. More Trans people means the terms that define Men and Women become more diluted, and more people are positioned against the perceived ingroup, or bourgeoisie (Cisgenders). More unnecessary, irreversible surgeries on the young and old, more people pushed towards just being Trans (if they happen to be a masculine girl or feminine boy), and more casualties of permanently altered lives just to fill up the ranks. This is why I normally say that the activists don't want happy Trans people; they just want MORE Trans people.

For the groomer tag to not be relevant, you would need more Trans people going off and living their lives without trying to influence anyone down their path. If they were sought out by someone younger for guidance, then that Trans person would have a responsibility to be upfront about the dangers of all the surgeries and medications that came with being Trans so that this kid could see both the benefits and drawbacks (it would also be a big responsibility for medical practitioners to do this too). Not to dissuade the kid but to fully inform them of what they're in for, and where they may regret their decisions, Gender Dysphoria aside...

If you advocate for any kind of Trans-ness or gender-affirming surgery, and you DON'T talk about its trade-offs, byproducts, or risks AT ALL...then you are a fucking groomer. Simple as.

A little tangential but in response to your first paragraph: my biggest issue is that they absolutely will not settle for tolerance (which is the most any reasonable person can ask for) - they DEMAND acceptance.

 

[O-BLOCK NIGGA!]

A little tangential but in response to your first paragraph: my biggest issue is that they absolutely will not settle for tolerance (which is the most any reasonable person can ask for) - they DEMAND acceptance.

The demand for acceptance comes from The Open View that the Left holds about humanity, which requires totalitarian programming to be realized. If you believe that humanity is inherently perfectible and that the only thing stopping it from developing further is that 7 billion people don't think that X is Y (from what I wrote earlier), the only logical conclusion would be that one would have to engage in totalitarianism, to make any kind of coherent reality from that.

In this case; tolerance isn't viable. It's antithetical.

 

[Cruisin’ Joe Cumia]

The inherent idea with the Left's perception of Trans people is that when they argue for the existence of Trans, they argue as if these people want to be "left alone" to come to terms with their identity. Almost like they're advocating for the "don't tread on me" Libertarian stance concerning Trans identities.

Here's the problem with that:

We KNOW the Woke/Left's positions on Power (reality is only real based on who's wielding power because that's the driving force in all of reality, and if 7 billion people believed that X is Y, then X is now magically Y), and we KNOW their positions on ALL relationships between people (as being some variety of oppressor/oppressed, ingroup/outgroup). It is highly likely that if you're Trans, you are on the Left.

Therefore, based on what we've all observed from the Left (that is listed above); we cannot expect Trannies to NOT be groomers in all (or most) situations, since trooning more kids and obscuring the lines between Men and Women would align with their worldview and causes. More Trans people means the terms that define Men and Women become more diluted, and more people are positioned against the perceived ingroup, or bourgeoisie (Cisgenders). More unnecessary, irreversible surgeries on the young and old, more people pushed towards just being Trans (if they happen to be a masculine girl or feminine boy), and more casualties of permanently altered lives just to fill up the ranks. This is why I normally say that the activists don't want happy Trans people; they just want MORE Trans people.

For the groomer tag to not be relevant, you would need more Trans people going off and living their lives without trying to influence anyone down their path. If they were sought out by someone younger for guidance, then that Trans person would have a responsibility to be upfront about the dangers of all the surgeries and medications that came with being Trans so that this kid could see both the benefits and drawbacks (it would also be a big responsibility for medical practitioners to do this too). Not to dissuade the kid but to fully inform them of what they're in for, and where they may regret their decisions, Gender Dysphoria aside...

If you advocate for any kind of Trans-ness or gender-affirming surgery, and you DON'T talk about its trade-offs, byproducts, or risks AT ALL...then you are a fucking groomer. Simple as.

Oh, Ok

 

[TorquieTwoBeers]

The demand for acceptance comes from The Open View that the Left holds about humanity, which requires totalitarian programming to be realized. If you believe that humanity is inherently perfectible and that the only thing stopping it from developing further is that 7 billion people don't think that X is Y (from what I wrote earlier), the only logical conclusion could be that one would have to engage in totalitarianism, to make any kind of coherent reality from that.

In this case; tolerance isn't viable. It's antithetical.

Like 95% of people don't give a shit about any of this stuff. You don't need to get worked up about the Left or tolerance or acceptance or any of this shit. The only people who care are the ones who are online all day long, and they're losers so who gives a shit.

 

[StlakerFatti]

How do you not just bully this guy until suicide for saying half the country is fascists?

We don't directly interact with lolcows on this forum. You meant to post this on kiwifarms.

 

[Turry Fawks]

Like 95% of people don't give a shit about any of this stuff. You don't need to get worked up about the Left or tolerance or acceptance or any of this shit. The only people who care are the ones who are online all day long, and they're losers so who gives a shit.

If you have kids in elementary school and they're bringing back books about how little boys can grow up to be mermaids (along with drawings of the boy hanging out with obvious adult male faggots) and you still don't give a shit you're probably a soy faggot tbh

 

[O-BLOCK NIGGA!]

Like 95% of people don't give a shit about any of this stuff. You don't need to get worked up about the Left or tolerance or acceptance or any of this shit. The only people who care are the ones who are online all day long, and they're losers so who gives a shit.

Hey Chapo

 

[EraGodless]

Fatrick is the kind of retard who can't point out a logical fallacy without making a logical fallacy.
Its bothsiderism because you say so is it, fat fascist?

Nice begging the question, child.