• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

"The website they linked to is a cyberterrorism site that exists only to host factual information about my life that makes me uncomfortable"

HalfHouseFatty

Monkey HOUSE
Forum Clout
9,165
2r74s9qpuppjvbeu9d9nlvqhgn._SY300_.jpg

This is D.M. Youngblood from Arizona, the person who is looking for reviews of her books.
 
Forum Clout
1,430

CarolMaxheinie

Runner, Unlike Fatrick
Forum Clout
21,344
a business I'm involved with could mass-mail a printout to the entire zipcode locality with a couple of clicks.

Could somebody inform me of any legal reasons why I shouldn't, since it seems legit from my research

You would assume legal responsibility for the truthfulness of the article, unless you sent this publication with the caveat that “people say….”.

The first amendment clearly protects telling the truth regardless of how inconvenient it is for someone, so assuming you are comfortable that the article is truthful, then you’re legally within your rights to do so.
 
Forum Clout
1,430
a business I'm involved with could mass-mail a printout to the entire zipcode locality with a couple of clicks.

Could somebody inform me of any legal reasons why I shouldn't, since it seems legit from my research
i wouldnt reccomend it, too long a paper trail and it would actually be a milwaukee matter... as opposed to i dont know calling pat fat on the internet. you're gonna lose that lawsuit and im not in jail. buh bye
 
Forum Clout
27,752
G

guest

Guest
a business I'm involved with could mass-mail a printout to the entire zipcode locality with a couple of clicks.

Could somebody inform me of any legal reasons why I shouldn't, since it seems legit from my research
You would assume legal responsibility for the truthfulness of the article, unless you sent this publication with the caveat that “people say….”.

The first amendment clearly protects telling the truth regardless of how inconvenient it is for someone, so assuming you are comfortable that the article is truthful, then you’re legally within your rights to do so.

You'd be within your rights sure, but that doesn't mean someone can't bring action against you. Since you are physically interacting as a business with that location you'd most likely fall under the long arm statute. Therefore, even if you live in a strong anti-slapp state, Wisconsin doesn't have any such laws and the action could be brought against you there. Anti-slapp is specifically for these kinds of things, but you're out of luck in Wisconsin.

Something to consider.

~~not a lawyer ~~
 

Jim Norton’s Wife's Cock

Those breeches will stay open!
Forum Clout
31,442
He's gone from implying the KF thread is all lies, to implying KF is a "cyberterrorist" site that purposely goes out of it's way to harrass and atalk "innocent" people. You are a bonafide lolcow Patty, you chose the path you are on, and refused to turn back even though you were given more than enough chances, don't try to take the moral highground you fat cunt, you gleefully try to ruin peoples lives if they don't agree with your retarded hot takes and politics.

Also, bear in mind, there is always the ED page about Patty, granted it is a little more on the nose than the KF thread, but still.. pretty funny shit.

 

Jim Norton’s Wife's Cock

Those breeches will stay open!
Forum Clout
31,442
If you're going to share with normies how disgusting a person Patrick is, you cant show them the encyclopaedia dramatica page, their heads would explode and they would believe patso instead.
Indeed, imagining the look on a M.M Schill types face as they read the ED page is hilarious.. still, it was just a reminder that the page is there if ever needed, it gets nowhere near as much love as it deserves, fawkin hilarious.
 

Easily_Remembered

It looks like she don't have an ass crack lmao
Forum Clout
67,952
Can't you guys just post screenshots of his actual posts showing his guilty behavior? You'd take away his go-to excuse. It changes from someone reiterating his words from his account, to now LITERALLY being his words on his own account. What excuse could he use then?

I imagine that someone could make a collage of Pat's "greatest hits" along with a very flattering picture, similar to that famous "actual tough guy" collage, that could easily and effectively communicate what a collosal cunt Chris Chins is.
 
Top