• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

Robinson et al v. City of Milwaukee et al

Faggot Boqposter

The Alawite Assassin
Forum Clout
32,685
I’ll post this knowing full well >1% will actually watch it, but the Milwaukee mayor is like a character out of the Boondocks. She’s so absurd it defies parody. She speaks in Ebonics and just blatantly uses tax money for nail extensions, first class fights, basketball tickets, etc


Good video but she’s the mayor of negro infested shithole suburb of Chicago not Milwaukee.
 
Forum Clout
9,177
I was about to ask "there's no way Milwaukee has a gem like her. Like the one running those two podunk Illinois townships".

She's been my obsession for the past month. Woah. Wiiiild. The expenses, the dumb civic projects (skating rink!), the 24/7 police "security" detail, DJs at gov't meetings, the village's vehicle loans maybe defaulting... making it so that she makes 200k+, but if she leaves the post the next sucker makes 24k...
 

Prison Enjoyer

"My father is not an active homosexual, stlaker"
Forum Clout
36,621
6f90fb1698decc76daf6cb893625d649.png

5463b43b80b70d3a8ccb9cfbe987870a.png
 

Libby Son Of Loin

WACTIONABLY WEATENING S-S-SUE WIGHTNING
Forum Clout
111,128
Lol you funsters can’t even get my incorrect math right…I said 125 x 100 was 100,000. Not 200,000. This will be telephoned to eventually “Sue said 25 x 100 is a million!”

Retard
Explain to me in your least retarded understanding what the role of a judge in the legal system is
 

Sue Lightning

Faggot.
Forum Clout
119,429
Explain to me in your least retarded understanding what the role of a judge in the legal system is
Well I’ll just focus on criminal law. They preside over a trial. They control the trial…for lack of a better word. The judge…judges. If a lawyer argues opposing counsel is say, asking a question irrelevant to the charges, the judge decides if that objection is sustained or overruled. This can also be in regards to evidentiary matters like what can or can’t be shown to a jury. If it’s a jury trial the jury deliberates and comes back with a sentencing. Based on all the evidence and the sentencing the judge then decides the appropriate sentence or, rarely and under specific circumstances, overturns the verdict of the jury all together.

Edit: Verdict not sentencing fawwwk!
 

Libby Son Of Loin

WACTIONABLY WEATENING S-S-SUE WIGHTNING
Forum Clout
111,128
Well I’ll just focus on criminal law. They preside over a trial. They control the trial…for lack of a better word. The judge…judges. If a lawyer argues opposing counsel is say, asking a question irrelevant to the charges, the judge decides if that objection is sustained or overruled. This can also be in regards to evidentiary matters like what can or can’t be shown to a jury. If it’s a jury trial the jury deliberates and comes back with a sentencing. Based on all the evidence and the sentencing the judge then decides the appropriate sentence or, rarely and under specific circumstances, overturns the verdict of the jury all together.

Edit: Verdict not sentencing fawwwk!
ok now explain why you posted this:

1710985637339.png
 

Sue Lightning

Faggot.
Forum Clout
119,429
ok now explain why you posted this:

View attachment 189144
Bad phrasing. And me being retarded. “Finding them innocent” only applies to non-jury trials or certain venues which don’t have juries like civil cases (but even then you’re not found “innocent”, again me being retarded). If I wanted to parlay that into my point about criminal trials though I would say “Well, even if a jury finds someone guilty, the judge can technically reverse it and thus TECHNICALLY find them innocent!”. And the “giving them a light sentence” shit isn’t retarded because that happens all the time. Judges are people and even though they’re supposed to be unbiased…shieeet not always.
 

Libby Son Of Loin

WACTIONABLY WEATENING S-S-SUE WIGHTNING
Forum Clout
111,128
Bad phrasing. And me being retarded. “Finding them innocent” only applies to non-jury trials or certain venues which don’t have juries like civil cases (but even then you’re not found “innocent”, again me being retarded). If I wanted to parlay that into my point about criminal trials though I would say “Well, even if a jury finds someone guilty, the judge can technically reverse it and thus TECHNICALLY find them innocent!”. And the “giving them a light sentence” shit isn’t retarded because that happens all the time. Judges are people and even though they’re supposed to be unbiased…shieeet not always.
Ok, thanks
 
Forum Clout
6,223
You people who think the City won’t fight tooth and nail on this and will try to settle are insane (sorry Fez).

City Attorneys live for this kind of shit. When their usual job entails proof reading contracts and other paper pushing nonsense, they love fighting to keep the city from having a precedent set to have to pay out anything.
Are you saying the greatest legal minds of this generation over on Kiwifarms are wrong?
 

quasi101

the $83,736.99 fugitive
Forum Clout
78,303
Bad phrasing. And me being retarded. “Finding them innocent” only applies to non-jury trials or certain venues which don’t have juries like civil cases (but even then you’re not found “innocent”, again me being retarded). If I wanted to parlay that into my point about criminal trials though I would say “Well, even if a jury finds someone guilty, the judge can technically reverse it and thus TECHNICALLY find them innocent!”. And the “giving them a light sentence” shit isn’t retarded because that happens all the time. Judges are people and even though they’re supposed to be unbiased…shieeet not always.
Are you a britfag becuase this is wrong jn the US
 

chewtoyrapist

Comin for that ass, nigga.
Forum Clout
16,467
Are you a britfag becuase this is wrong jn the US
He's probably thinking of jury nullification and judges getting personal discretion in sentencing. Very gay man, they say he's the son of robert prongay but no no robert prongay has only varsity sons. 5 letter man this robert prongay, would never have a gay son, I say.
 
Top