• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

Robinson et al v. City of Milwaukee et al

N

Nick Gerlips

‎
‎
Forum Clout
20,634
This is what Milwaukee attorneys will be looking at for the next year
1000007772.png
 
Libby Son Of Loin

Libby Son Of Loin

WACTIONABLY WEATENING S-S-SUE WIGHTNING
‎
‎
Forum Clout
111,001
Riccardo Bosi said:
I hate to think of Pat as a Sex Haver and I don't want to tell people what to wear around the house - it's none of my business - but for God's sake, keep some sweatpants around and don't think you get to answer the front door practically nude.

What Rick wears answering the door should be considered lewd misconduct towards Trick Or Treating kids or scout girls trying to sell cookies.

Throw the book at this bastard already, I say!


It's apples and bowling balls, Tony.

But even in forgetting all of this, he claims he's been "SWATTed". I think not even once this has happened, so his case is bullshit. He also happens to be fat.
Click to expand...
He was wearing his robe naked because he knew they were coming
 
WifeStoreWill

WifeStoreWill

The WifeStore called, they’re running out of gooks
‎
Forum Clout
32,859
Slackjawed Cow said:
There are some differences to pats case from the one I posted but she leaned heavy into the " handcuffed naked" and I think Pat will too. For the lady, they were serving a warrant ( rammed the door open) on someone that hasnt lived there for 4 years so there were some real mistakes made by the police from the start. Where in pats case they were at the correct location the call requested and were just following procedure. I just think pat is going to claim "damages" from being handcuffed with his pee pee out after answering the door without putting shorts/pants on.
Click to expand...
Also they never busted into his house once during this whole thing. There’s no reason he couldn’t have put some fucking pants on before answering the door. That was his choice.
 
Riccardo Bosi

Riccardo Bosi

has janny powers
‎
‎
Forum Clout
70,203
Libby's Fat Footster said:
He was wearing his robe naked because he knew they were coming
Click to expand...
FatPatsBaps said:
Here's something else to schinkle about: if Pat was so humilated with regards to being escorted naked outside while the police searched his home, then why did he willingly send CCTV of said situation to the news outlets?
Click to expand...
You answered your own question, Bapster. He doesn't mind being humiliated (he's been at this for five years, or about fourteen if you count the Lappening) as long as he can grift for money and attention.

Await the knock, thinker. Not being in prison awaits.
 
PorqueDealer

PorqueDealer

Portly Pepperoni Purveyor
‎
‎
Forum Clout
38,166
Libby's Fat Footster said:
He was wearing his robe naked because he knew they were coming
Click to expand...
Cuphead said:
I actually never thought about that. He was purposely naked so he could make it an element of the story to make the swattings sound ever worse.
Click to expand...

Pat had written the script for how it was to go down a long time ago.
I was naked in my dressing gown was his line for the pepperonigate "swatting".
That did not occur (and pat knows that, of course) but its such good writing that Pat couldnt let it go, FF to aliviagate.

J5 was pat just reciting all the snarky lines he had thought up over the previous years. Everything he would say to the stlaker tied to the chair begging for mercy from Pat before he exacts his revenge.
I imagine the screaming at aliviagate was also mostly his rehearsed stlaker speech mixed with indignation that MKE PD are too stupid to follow his plan.
 
DominusOdium

DominusOdium

Unreasonably loud, boisterous and intoxicated
‎
‎
Forum Clout
40,885
Cuphead said:
I actually never thought about that. He was purposely naked so he could make it an element of the story to make the swattings sound ever worse.
Click to expand...
He used to post pictues of himself nude holding his shitty books to social media when he thought he was the buff stealthy geek. Well, more buff than what fat Worldcon sweathogs were used to seeing from writers like Weimer anyways.

He's very obviously fine with being publicly naked/exhibitionist and made sure to be so when his self swat arrived. In his mind it made it look humiliating and also like he couldn't possibly have done it himself because omg I don't even have the faucet covered!
 
JoeBrotheChildSpitGuzzler

JoeBrotheChildSpitGuzzler

Grand Cyclops of the Digital Ku Klux Klan
‎
‎
Forum Clout
48,749
The Talking Dead said:
Hahaha it really does. The "Their words fell on deaf ears" almost seems like it should have an "😔" after it. I'm no Brinton Resto but aren't legal documents like this supposed to avoid being emotive and just stick to the facts?

God he's an idiotic pig.
Click to expand...
It's the same thing that makes Russ Greers filings so funny. It's all about how the other party hurt his feelings and makes no actual legal arguments
 
SFWA liaison

SFWA liaison

Heidi Hildeman customer
‎
‎
Forum Clout
98,664
Cuphead said:
I actually never thought about that. He was purposely naked so he could make it an element of the story to make the swattings sound ever worse.
Click to expand...
plus he's suing over being naked in front of 4 male cops and the "humiliation" that entails, then turns around and gives the video and stills to Inside Edition and NBC for millions of people to watch the event?

The complete opposite of MPD, who refused to release the footage. They cared more about protecting his faucet than Pat himself.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top