• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

Robinson et al v. City of Milwaukee et al

AliceWorquer

Fat bitch with faggot tits
Forum Clout
18,272
P1.jpg

Jesus christ, Pat. This reads like a pacy scene from one of his novels. He has zero ability to modify that one note narrative voice of his.
 

The Talking Dead

My network, heart and book all failed. Hooly shit!
Forum Clout
31,453
View attachment 185794
Jesus christ, Pat. This reads like a pacy scene from one of his novels. He has zero ability to modify that one note narrative voice of his.

Hahaha it really does. The "Their words fell on deaf ears" almost seems like it should have an "😔" after it. I'm no Brinton Resto but aren't legal documents like this supposed to avoid being emotive and just stick to the facts?

God he's an idiotic pig.
 

TheGhostOfBernellTrammell

Getting my rocks off. Emptying my boulders.
Forum Clout
12,446
Hahaha it really does. The "Their words fell on deaf ears" almost seems like it should have an "😔" after it. I'm no Brinton Resto but aren't legal documents like this supposed to avoid being emotive and just stick to the facts?

God he's an idiotic pig.
Not just that but it claims Niki was "seized", a term used for property and not persons. Does Patrick think of his wife as property? Is he retarded? A combination of the two?
 

MonsterSteve

Age.
Forum Clout
32,920
View attachment 185794
Jesus christ, Pat. This reads like a pacy scene from one of his novels. He has zero ability to modify that one note narrative voice of his.
"Without a warrant"? Is he retarded? They don't need a warrant to search the house when its an emergency situation like that. He should google exigent circumstances but of course he won't because he's VERY dumb/fat.
 

Africa.com

the REAL Roxbury Rick. Mustard STINKS
Forum Clout
25,509
1. Dismissed on what grounds?

2. It depends on if it was dismissed with or without prejudice.

Federal Courts take forever to to get anything done most of the time. The Defendants won't let this go easily for him if they're going to make an example out of him.

Reminder: Fatso is pushing his wife in front of him as the main victim on this one. Most people will see through this as they investigate.
IF this gets to trial, the defense attorney is going to spend an hour or so really ramping up the questions about how terrified Fat is/was. And then he is ask "Mr Tomlinson, you're terrified for your life, but more importantly you're terrified for your wife's life, why do you go to the bar AFTER TWO VISITS PREVIOSULY IN ONE DAY?" The contempt in his voice is going to trigger Pat to become extra argumentative. Retard witnesses have this inability to admit stupid actions or inconsistencies they have to excuse EVERYTHING.
 

Africa.com

the REAL Roxbury Rick. Mustard STINKS
Forum Clout
25,509
Can someone think of a good explanation on why he sued officer Deshawn separately? Besides the fact that he was butthurt because the colored fella yelled at him.

This seems like such a dumb move but then again it is Pat.

Also lets say the city wants to settle. How much is he going to get? Families of dindus shot get millions but Robinson et al are white and only had some officers saying mean things and pointing ballistic shields at them.

24h later and it is still surreal.

edit : https://eu.jsonline.com/story/news/...ettle-police-lawsuits-for-200000/70520293007/

John Josiah Munoz jr lol "John J. Munoz, Jr. who alleged excessive force during a 2012 arrest ($10,000)"

It was probably the only officer he remembered talking to multiple times. He has to establish a pattern of behavior in order to prove his case essentially I ANAL just interested in it. He's alleging the police as a whole and that officer in particular should have known better, and violated his rights on multiple occasions.
 

DominusOdium

Unreasonably loud, boisterous and intoxicated
Forum Clout
40,815
This is the first time i've been uncertain that FAT is self-swatting, because like you said, he'd have to be the biggest retard ever to file this suit if he's been doing it. But on the other hand, everything we've seen so far suggests that he might just be the biggest retard ever.
I don't think he paid for the bulk of them. I think pretty much what Torswats presented is accurate: Patrick paid for the first couple to try to frame us and then sue the MPD to recoup his losses and get media fame.

He either did this with the help of Snackie or what I think, which is that he was told so many times "Well they use vpns and tor and protonmail so we can't track them" and figured he was smarter than anybody here so he could do the same and frame us for some actual heinous shit.

Then he stopped paying because he didn't see the point for whatever reason, maybe just decided he didn't have to since it was a criminal cyber terrorist, so Torswats in revenge then used his name and number to test out his setup and new numbers before swatting other people. That pretty clearly explains stuff like the Reno hotel call. I haven't seen any proof or evidence that contradicts what Torswats said, and the FBI case against him were he would swat himself for instance lines up with the same mindset.

I imagine he thinks because he was behind nine proxies and that Torswats is caught and guilty of so much more that any chance his initial purchases are caught or brought into this is low. He's a genius, you see. Surely the MPD who didn't know what reddit was don't know how to subpoena a VPN.
 
Forum Clout
9,143
"Mr Tomlinson, you're terrified for your life, but more importantly you're terrified for your wife's life, why do you go to the bar AFTER TWO VISITS PREVIOSULY IN ONE DAY?"
No, that's when he takes is lady's pantsuit jacket off, revealing a (two-sizes-too-small) Captain America t-shirt, and launches into a triumphant speech about not letting the terrorists win.
 
Forum Clout
2,786
This is the first time i've been uncertain that FAT is self-swatting, because like you said, he'd have to be the biggest retard ever to file this suit if he's been doing it. But on the other hand, everything we've seen so far suggests that he might just be the biggest retard ever.
He submitted evidence he himself faked to a court during the lawsuit against quasi and got away with it scott free. He edited evidence against BDA and got away with it scott free, i dont remember the judge even grilling him. Commiting an actual felony false flag for federal court is just the logical (1.2) next step for him
I don't think he paid for the bulk of them. I think pretty much what Torswats presented is accurate: Patrick paid for the first couple to try to frame us and then sue the MPD to recoup his losses and get media fame.

He either did this with the help of Snackie or what I think, which is that he was told so many times "Well they use vpns and tor and protonmail so we can't track them" and figured he was smarter than anybody here so he could do the same and frame us for some actual heinous shit.

Then he stopped paying because he didn't see the point for whatever reason, maybe just decided he didn't have to since it was a criminal cyber terrorist, so Torswats in revenge then used his name and number to test out his setup and new numbers before swatting other people. That pretty clearly explains stuff like the Reno hotel call. I haven't seen any proof or evidence that contradicts what Torswats said, and the FBI case against him were he would swat himself for instance lines up with the same mindset.

I imagine he thinks because he was behind nine proxies and that Torswats is caught and guilty of so much more that any chance his initial purchases are caught or brought into this is low. He's a genius, you see. Surely the MPD who didn't know what reddit was don't know how to subpoena a VPN.
Iirc it was around swat #30 when torswats claimed he was stiffed so yeah rick did buy a ton.
 

Africa.com

the REAL Roxbury Rick. Mustard STINKS
Forum Clout
25,509
No, that's when he takes is lady's pantsuit jacket off, revealing a (two-sizes-too-small) Captain America t-shirt, and launches into a triumphant speech about not letting the terrorists win.
The lawyer would be smarter than me and ask it as a yes no question. Making Pat even angrier. This is why I didn't go to law school (also the constant drinking)
 

FranksWirecutters

Glow nigger. Got any of those IPs for me?
Forum Clout
31,573
View attachment 185794
Jesus christ, Pat. This reads like a pacy scene from one of his novels. He has zero ability to modify that one note narrative voice of his.
I don't get involved in many court documents.

1) do you
2) really use
3) use a numbered
4) list to break up
5) sentences for legal filings?

Most of that reads like it should just be one thought instead of 1) this happened. 2) this happened. 3) this happened
 

quasi101

the $83,736.99 fugitive
Forum Clout
78,300
1. Dismissed on what grounds?

2. It depends on if it was dismissed with or without prejudice.

Federal Courts take forever to to get anything done most of the time. The Defendants won't let this go easily for him if they're going to make an example out of him.

Reminder: Fatso is pushing his wife in front of him as the main victim on this one. Most people will see through this as they investigate.
Qualified immunity is the big one. A jury essentially adjudicates what the facts are. The case can be dismissed if the judge rules, "even if all the facts are true, you lose anyway". Then theres nothing for the court to do. The state has to submit a motion to dismiss claiming that.

If it gets a little further in the process then they can Submit an msj (motion for summary judgment) , which essentially says the same thing. An msj is more stating after discovery "there are no facts in dispute here". In that case the judge can rule on the law as there's nothing for a jury to do.
 
Forum Clout
43,047
I don't get involved in many court documents.

1) do you
2) really use
3) use a numbered
4) list to break up
5) sentences for legal filings?

Most of that reads like it should just be one thought instead of 1) this happened. 2) this happened. 3) this happened

 
Top