Robinson et al v. City of Milwaukee et al

[Jen_Tomlinson]

Can’t believe the Pat business is back after Jimmy married a living breathing cock and the count almost died.

 

[quasi101]

What a fucking moron. Just reading this is hilarious since pat probably doesn't realize they wrote detailed reports on these incidents so he can't just make shit up. "I was cuffed completely naked" were you? What about your robe stupid. I think his lawyer hasn't figured out yet how dishonest he is or they just picked someone who would write whatever they said. But unfortunately it probably won't get too hilarious since they are going to get this tossed citing qualified immunity so they won't have to get into unraveling all his lies and exaggerations.


I hope the video of him threatening a lawsuit after struggling with officers and refusing to calm down doesn't hurt his case....

In some states the jury is instructed that one witness testimony is enough to prove a fact. I think its retarded but it's codified in the jury instructions. I'd have to dig out wisconsin civil law to confirm. But regardless don't they have the body cam footage anyway?

 

[SFWA liaison]

can we finally get lawtubers to do Pat with this case? tweet at them

 

[cachorro]

If the lawyers representing Pat are informed of his history of evidence planting and twitter conduct, which I'm sure they will be at some point, won't ignoring that look really bad when it starts coming up in the defense? I have to believe that they were only told one side of the story.

If Pat tells them he didn’t do it, that’s all they need to cover their asses. Even if they were somewhat complicit, you’d have to find another lawyer willing to pull his card. Lawyers won’t typically rat out other lawyers unless it has to do with a case they are directly involved in

 

[quasi101]

I just assume that they're taking the money up front and have no reputation to lose. Law schools were graduating 10s of thousands of more leeches than society needed, per year, just under a decade ago. Back in 2015 you couldn't read about anything law related without someone sounding off how there were way too many of them.

Plenty of these losers around

 

[quasi101]

They know a judge would see right through the bullshit. So they want to try and dupe 12 retards who couldn't figure out how to get out of jury duty into feeling bad for them and handing them a win.

the state will voir dire the fuck out of it. now finding a non retard in Wisconsin might be difficult, but you can usually find bored retired guys at least that are not "too stupid to get out of jury duty".

 

[Easily_Remembered]

 

[guest]

If the lawyers representing Pat are informed of his history of evidence planting and twitter conduct, which I'm sure they will be at some point, won't ignoring that look really bad when it starts coming up in the defense? I have to believe that they were only told one side of the story.

Boomia you fat retard stay away from this case.

 

[JoeBrotheChildSpitGuzzler]

In some states the jury is instructed that one witness testimony is enough to prove a fact. I think its retarded but it's codified in the jury instructions. I'd have to dig out wisconsin civil law to confirm. But regardless don't they have the body cam footage anyway?

That still doesn't get around qualified immunity.

Meanwhile pat is tweeting an about another schizo filing

 

[Slackjawed Cow]

Good thing pat has made a name for himself down at the local courthouse. For his fence, Quasis original case, BDA, and then his contempt. None of those visits to the courthouse won any of the judges over. Now this. Once word spreads that some retard is suing the city and a cop, Im sure there will be a " Oh THAT guy!?"

 

[Africa.com]

I wonder why the fuck these lawyers take these jobs where their plaintiff obviously has no case. Are they just stupid? Or are they grifting? If they’re grifting, is that worth their reputation? It also assumes the lawyer is being paid up front rather than on the agreement of a settlement. But if theres no case…theres no settlement. I just don’t get it. Is it not in their ethical code or whatever to not string along clients?

Haven't read the whole document but I'm sure this huckster lawyer is on a contingency (I'd guess 40% of a settlement and 50% if it goes to a jury), and is angling for it to not even get to a jury.

 

[IGotATreeOnMyHouse85]

Good thing pat has made a name for himself down at the local courthouse. For his fence, Quasis original case, BDA, and then his contempt. None of those visits to the courthouse won any of the judges over. Now this. Once word spreads that some retard is suing the city and a cop, Im sure there will be a " Oh THAT guy!?"

Absolutely - he’s the town asshole and everyone that is aware of him can’t stand the pig

 

[Africa.com]

can we finally get lawtubers to do Pat with this case? tweet at them

Your best bet will be Potentially Criminal he's made Pat references before

 

[Sue Lightning]

People don’t realize that the vast majority of independent and small practice lawyers are closer to Saul Goodman than Harvey Specter. These niggas get through the pipeline with every shortcut imaginable (including, perhaps, a few of our own brothermen!) and when they get rejected from jobs at real firms because their degree doesn’t have Stanford or Harvard written on it they go apeshit.

I guess i’m thinking too rationally. That if you went to school for 8 years just to work in a job you would do anything to make sure those 8 years aren’t a waste…look at someone like Resto. Representing Pat basically set back his career and it was for nothing.

 

[quasi101]

I guess i’m thinking too rationally. That if you went to school for 8 years just to work in a job you would do anything to make sure those 8 years aren’t a waste…look at someone like Resto. Representing Pat basically set back his career and it was for nothing.

Because 99/100 times nothing happens. Lawyers break the law and are unethical all the time and nothing ever happens. In this instance though, Brinton J Resto committed a crime by submitting illegally obtained evidence.

 

[Sue Lightning]

Why would a city just settle something like this? What is the police force supposed to do? I'm not saying it can't or won't happen but I think the notion that they'll just pay then to go away doesn't make sense. I'm sure it's been brought up already but wouldn't it set them up for everyone suing for everything all the time? They're responding to the calls whether they're fake or not.

Again…16 DICK ABOUT LAW

I imagine their first course of action would be to dismiss based on the frivolous nature of the case. If the judge says “No his claims have merit” the police will argue “Well…qualified immunity”. And if the judge, for some reason, says “that doesn’t apply” i think at that point they’d settle. Because then their option is genuinely arguing against Pats claims and wasting resources. BUT WHAT DO I KNOW….

Quasi, comment? Your fathers legal knowledge would help out

 

[IGotATreeOnMyHouse85]

Because 99/100 times nothing happens. Lawyers break the law and are unethical all the time and nothing ever happens. In this instance though, Brinton J Resto committed a crime by submitting illegally obtained evidence.

And lied in court that all the John does were in Wisconsin.

I remember a line from the show “The League” that sums it all up “this is a law office, lying is not only accepted it’s encouraged”

 

[guest]

I just assume that they're taking the money up front and have no reputation to lose. Law schools were graduating 10s of thousands of more leeches than society needed, per year, just under a decade ago. Back in 2015 you couldn't read about anything law related without someone sounding off how there were way too many of them.

Plenty of these losers around

A lot of people give them way too much credit too. One of my oldest friends is a tax lawyer for a huge bank and he's a retard who literally can't do basic maths. He's a hard worker and has the gift of the gab, but is baffled by the simplest algebra. And he's one of the successful ones. It's hard to imagine how dumb the Restos of the world are.

 

[Slackjawed Cow]

Absolutely - he’s the town asshole and everyone that is aware of him can’t stand the pig

I also forgot Pat failed restraining order on Dan too

 

[quasi101]

Again…16 DICK ABOUT LAW

I imagine their first course of action would be to dismiss based on the frivolous nature of the case. If the judge says “No his claims have merit” the police will argue “Well…qualified immunity”. And if the judge, for some reason, says “that doesn’t apply” i think at that point they’d settle. Because then their option is genuinely arguing against Pats claims and wasting resources. BUT WHAT DO I KNOW….

Quasi, comment? Your fathers legal knowledge would help out

qualified immunity is an affirmative defense that would need to be raised. Cases don't just get "thrown out" there are pre-discovery reasons. One you are familiar with would be the quash, but not serving properly etc can be done ex parte. So a judge can "throw it out" for certain procedural reasons. Maybe its the wrong venue, or the plaintiff doesn't have standing. But the reason anti-slapp laws exist is because you can sue anyone for anything and if you pay the court fee and the paper works is basically correct someone has to defend themselves. Unless the person is a vexatious litigant (which is hard to get), then it will proceed.