• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

Project Verifat subject Rick, oinks "it is inadmissible"

Gay Faggot.

Gay Faggot.

When the frying pan hits just right.
‎
‎
Forum Clout
78,152
covidcumia said:
Fucking fat rube would talk up anybody in a Brewer's hat at the bar, FWIW I actually like Milwaukee, the waterfront is nice too. Too bad he gives it a bad name.
Click to expand...
Yeah I hate that he gives the Midwest a bad name. The people are really nice, and it’s beautiful when it’s not winter. It’s just scary there’s a man pig lurking the streets. Waiting for his next POC victim.
 
G

guest

Guest
CanISitOnJonsLap said:
My question is, technically isn't Thomas Apostle a journalist? As least as much as Patrick considers himself a comedian or pundit.

He might not work for huffpo but he's presenting a story that's been read and commented on by several notable public figures in the comedy world. Doesn't that qualify?
Click to expand...

It is annoying but this is another it depends and is based on the state. A lot of state supreme courts don't want to weight in on it since they don't want their own section 230 decision to deal with in the future. In California there were a few decisions both for an against, but they were careful not to create a precedent saying that internet journalism, blogging etc. were definitively journalism.

There's usually a balancing test, similar to Krinsky where whatever the journalist is trying to protect or distribute is weighed against the oppositions claim. In Krinsky they are balancing free speech and anonymity vs vague statements and book reviews.


not a lawyer though so this is all bullshit.
 
G

guest

Guest
krinsky actually cites one of those cases

[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2303038/krinsky-v-doe/?[/URL]
On July 6, 2006 the court requested additional briefing on two questions: whether O'Grady v. Superior Court (2006) 139 Cal. App. 4th 1423, [URL='https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2305468/ogrady-v-superior-court/']44 Cal. Rptr. 3d 72 [/URL]applied to this case; and whether there was "any consideration of whether the actions of the defendants [had violated] any State or Federal securities laws." After receiving supplemental briefs from each party on these questions, the court denied the motion to quash. The court recognized the applicability of the First Amendment to speech on the Internet and summarized the holdings of several appellate courts addressing claims of free speech in the context of libel suits. The court did not decide, however, whether Doe 6's messages were protected speech. Instead, it looked to the issues it had posed to the parties and specifically found that Doe 6's conduct appeared to be similar to federal cases involving "`pump and dump' stock manipulation" efforts. The court expressly adopted plaintiffs supplemental brief, concluding that "[t]he issues raised by this Court" and "the totality of the circumstances of this case justif[y] the relief Plaintiff is seeking [sic].
Click to expand...

[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2305468/ogrady-v-superior-court/[/URL]

However, the courts generally have been liberal in defining these terms, for example, by including freelance reporters in the protection of the privilege. See, e.g., People v. Von Villas, 10 Cal. App. 4th 201, 231-32, 13 Cal. Rptr. 2d 62 (1992); Playboy Enters., Inc. v. Superior Court, 154 Cal. App. 3d 14, 28-29, 201 Cal. Rptr. 207 (1984). California courts also have extended the privilege to bloggers engaged in the gathering and dissemination of news. O’Grady v. Superior Court, 139 Cal. App. 4th 1423, 1457, 44 Cal. Rptr. 3d 72 (2006).
Click to expand...
 
G

guest

Guest
CarolMaxheinie said:
There’s nothing criminal about ordering the most syrupy, impossible to clean sticky drink possible then accidentally spilling it on his electronics. Oopsie Doodles are not admissible in courT, cyberstlaker
Click to expand...
A triple shot of Jager just running under her his keys lol. Sorry, but bars are for drinks not smelly, sweaty, discount, Brewers hats, or shitty Windows 7 laptops, pig boy.
 
G

guest

Guest
CarolMaxheinie said:
Pat is sexually attracted to @covidcumia and would make pudding in both sides of his adult diaper if his crush spit on him. Why give the fat asshole what he wants?
Click to expand...
TMI confession, I make my wife spit in my mouth when she's on top, she is much less fond of that 15 years in lol. I actually think he at a minimum, looks forward to my texts and at maximum full on wants an anal raping from me lol.
 
Harry Powell

Harry Powell

not a fan of comedy, I’m a fan of cruelty
‎
‎
Forum Clout
93,676
Gay Faggot. said:
Text that info to Rick dude. He’s your real friend not us.
Click to expand...
I actually like this bit idea. You should just start sending him really friendly shit, general life talk, etc. “Hey Rick hope you have a great morning, rise and grind brother!” Couple hours later - “how’s the sex life? I love when my old lady spits in my mouth, but I’m running out of ways to keep the bedroom fresh. Any ideas?” Etc
 
G

guest

Guest
Harry Kilmer said:
I actually like this bit idea. You should just start sending him really friendly shit, general life talk, etc. “Hey Rick hope you have a great morning, rise and grind brother!” Couple hours later - “how’s the sex life? I love when my old lady spits in my mouth, but I’m running out of ways to keep the bedroom fresh. Any ideas?” Etc
Click to expand...
I tried that when he regularly answered, he just did the canned lines. I have about a 100 text exchanges I never posted, most are repetitive shit of his bad assery and 80's action movie lines. He's a real one trick piggy, anybody texting him deserves some credit for dealing with that lump of mush and making anything useful from him. It's like baseball if you can go 3 for 10 on him, you're a hall of famer. me I'm hitting like a pitcher lol.
 
RobertMewler

RobertMewler

‎
‎
Forum Clout
98,839
covidcumia said:
You know I thought that too, and thought if he leaves we leave 5 minutes later. Just like he boasts he's got a CCW and tells people "take it outside", brave guy, while armed.
Click to expand...
You can bring a concealed handgun into a bar in Wisconsin but you can't drink alcohol while there.

one sip could land you with up to 9 months in jail and/or a $10,000 fine.
Click to expand...

www.grievelaw.com

Can You Concealed Carry In A Bar In Wisconsin? | Grieve Law Milwaukee, Brookfield, Madison, WI

Can you conceal carry in a bar in Wisconsin? Find out the laws and exceptions to avoid a charge.
www.grievelaw.com www.grievelaw.com

Gotcha, Oinky!
 
G

guest

Guest
Chive Turkey said:
Hahaha wow, this just keeps getting better and better.

Imagine if the outcome of this Dumb Quijote suit is a second, better divorce because the bailliffs showed up to starship repo Nikki's shit. It would be karma, as Quasi's people say.
Click to expand...
[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.bills.com/debt/wisconsin-spousal-liability-for-debt[/URL]

As a practical matter, even in community property states, many creditors do not go to the trouble of suing both spouses, as doing so tends to complicate the legal process involved in obtaining a judgment. However, this does not mean that a particularly aggressive creditor will not pursue all of its available rights to collect a debt. Think of it this way: By marrying a spouse with debt and residing in a community property state you bought a ticket to an anti-lottery. Your chances of losing are small, but you risk that your number may be called.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top