• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

Project Verifat subject Rick, oinks "it is inadmissible"

G

guest

Guest
d0d299f88291932217894e87d484a806.jpg


I have like 25 screenshots, if there is a line somebody wants the shot of say it below and I'll upload it.

2021-09-16 09:38 UTC - You:
You aren't going to last long in jail when you go there for contempt, when you don't pay quasi after the court order. The tape of you saying you won't pay will be used as evidence. You won't do well in jail.

2021-09-16 09:47 UTC - You:
Wait until you see what comes next, all you had to do was stop tweeting hate, but you were too stupid to do that. Now the life you have is ending and the either penniless or in jail one begins stlaker. Your obsession with hate caused this. Me explaining your mistakes to you is not a crime. The consequences of uour actions brought you this shame, lies and deciet are never good. Do you care to comment on the next 3 before they're released to get out in front of them? It's so perfect what is happening next.

2021-09-16 09:48 UTC - You:
Squeals of sorrow now are too late, all you had to do was stop celebrating death and violence.

2021-09-16 09:52 UTC - +16085669287:
Nothing is happening to me next, stlaker. I have told no lies, and your recordings only contain me reciting your endless crimes. They make only you and your obsessive cult look bad, not me. Oh, and no, they're not admissible as evidence, as they were fraudulently and illegally obtained. Nor do I face jail, because I have committed no crimes, of any kind, and the judge already said we don't owe Quasi a penny. You really, really should've listened to the hearing more closely, stlaker. What comes next is you get identified, arrested, and imprisoned. That was always how this story ended.

2021-09-16 09:54 UTC - You:
Imagine how Boykin will react to this story and what you thought when you thought you were threatening him. I hope he never heres of this shit, better off he just never learns of this, but man what thosd texts said, those threats about his life ending. I would not ever wish to deal with shit like that, you could have stopped tweeting, but you kept threatening even me protesting legitimately to your violent tweets.

2021-09-16 09:56 UTC - +16085669287:
You are not protesting, stlaker. You are committing a felony. You really needed to understand this many months ago. Too late now.

2021-09-16 09:57 UTC - You:
You literally admitted we should be murdered, you pose a threat to all of us.

2021-09-16 09:59 UTC - You:
Repeatedly saying my life is ending by text and then being record saying I need ro be put to death is pretty damning. Even the way you said it.

2021-09-16 10:00 UTC - You:
Say the line again or are you too chickenshit now.

2021-09-16 10:01 UTC - +16085669287:
Targets of endless, psychotic harassment often say such things about their abusers, stlaker. That's why we have a justice system to decide punishments for crimes such as yours.

2021-09-16 10:02 UTC - You:
You've boasted of doxxing, made death threats and were recorded saying we neex death, all because you get annoyed by our protests of the hate you spew. Plus you called cops stupid, judges fucking morons, claimed justice is about money, yea you're sane.

2021-09-16 10:02 UTC - You:
Targets of endless, psychotic harassment often say such things about their abusers, stlaker. That's why we have a justice system to decide punishments for crimes such as yours.

2021-09-16 10:03 UTC - You:
That justice system you're referring to is the one you admitted you'd ignore if you lose, plus you've made threats, that should work out well.

2021-09-16 10:04 UTC - +16085669287:
No, stlaker. It is not. Your incessant, obsessed harassment is damning. You are the only criminal here. You will be the one on trial here. You will be the one to face judgement and a sentence here.

2021-09-16 10:04 UTC - You:
How many tapes of us exist where we suggest you get killed fir your words.

2021-09-16 10:05 UTC - You:
None fatty pig, I just protest your words, you threaten me with death.

2021-09-16 10:05 UTC - You:
You will be charged shortly.

2021-09-16 10:05 UTC - You:
That is in motion now.

2021-09-16 10:06 UTC - You:
That is in motion now.

2021-09-16 10:06 UTC - You:
Only thing is you're on tape, on text, tweeted it, and we know who you are.

2021-09-16 10:07 UTC - +16085669287:
I have doxxed no one, stlaker. You have doxxed dozens. I have threatened no one, stlaker. You have threatened dozens. Your recordings are inadmissible in any court, stlaker. And you remain the only criminal here.

2021-09-16 10:08 UTC - You:
Who have I doxxed?

2021-09-16 10:10 UTC - You:
Who did I threaten? There's no law on admissibility of private recordings. Literally not how the exclusion rule works. I've done nothing myself besides text protest you. Hours of tapes of you, exist, they get better too lol. You dun goofed fat man.

2021-09-16 10:10 UTC - +16085669287:
No, stlaker. You are not protesting me. You are criminally harassing me. You unwanted texts to this number are felony telephone harassment. They are neither protest, nor protected speech. They are a crime. This is a fact. And no, stlaker, I will not be charged, not soon or in the future, as I have committed no crimes of any kind.

2021-09-16 10:13 UTC - +16085669287:
Yes, stlaker. There very much is a law on the admissibility of fraudulently obtained recordings. And even if there were not, there is absolutely nothing incriminating on any of them, except of course for me explaining all of the crimes you have committed against me, my family, our friends, and colleagues. All they do is make every one of you look like the sociopathic, obsessed defectives you have always been.

2021-09-16 10:13 UTC - You:
You're literally all over the internet calling judges, idiots, mocking justice, demanding death, being made a fool of, it's our own Project Verifat lol.

2021-09-16 10:15 UTC - +16085669287:
And just like Project Veritas, they are fraudulent, inadmissible, and themselves a criminal act.

2021-09-16 10:17 UTC - You:
Actually fatty you were told you were being recorded, a journalist recorded you, how is that fraud? You're so deranged you think the world works for you, there is no crime in making your words known. Sorry fatty, you literally took the words said back to you and passed them on too, paragon of morality that you are.

2021-09-16 10:19 UTC - You:
They are indeed admissible, truth in who a caller says they are has no impact on what you said. Next you'll claim entrapment by a journalist, this is how undercover journalism works.

2021-09-16 10:23 UTC - You:
They are indeed admissible, truth in who a caller says they are has no impact on what you said. Next you'll claim entrapment by a journalist, this is how undercover journalism works.

2021-09-16 10:23 UTC - You:
Listen tubby despite how much Law and Order you've watched, the tapes are perfectly admissible in Wisconsin which is a one party state, but you were informed anyhow. You gave consent you're owed no duty of truth regarding the person you talk to real idenity. Literally not how it works. You're screwed.

2021-09-16 10:27 UTC - You:
Your two options are explain the context or admit the words you spoke. Care to explain why uou think I should get death for annoying you? You said that, not me. You've also told me my life was ending. A reasonable person would call that a threat. So like I agree you consider my protest a crime, i do not, what defence to suggesting I be dxecuted for it do you offer? You sound very dangerous.

2021-09-16 10:30 UTC - You:
There are consequences you're a CCW holder making death threats that seem clearly to be serious, since you said to a journalist.

2021-09-16 10:30 UTC - +16085669287:
It is fraud because no, you are not a journalist, no, you do not work for HuffPost, and no, I did not consent for them to be made public. That is who I agreed to speak to, and on what conditions. You lied. That's why it's fraud and inadmissible. Surely even a complete mental case like you can understand. Sorry, stlaker. But you have nothing except another criminal act to be charged with.

2021-09-16 10:32 UTC - +16085669287:
I made no death threats, stlaker. And it doesn't matter what you "consider" your crimes to be. They are crimes. You are committing one right now by harassing this number. It's a felony. And no, you are not a journalist.

2021-09-16 10:33 UTC - You:
There's no law protecting you from lies . You weren't forced to say what you did, if anybody should know to verify an anonymous person it's 60 john doe guy. There's no laws on whether or not you get to decide if it goes public either, it's a one party state.

2021-09-16 10:35 UTC - +16085669287:
Wrong as always, stlaker.

2021-09-16 10:35 UTC - +16085669287:
But thank you for admitting you are a liar.

2021-09-16 10:35 UTC - You:
Actually you fat piece of shit I'm debating you are willing to engage, that's not a crime maybe a "stupid" judge can explain it ro you.

2021-09-16 10:39 UTC - +16085669287:
No, stlaker. You are not debating me. This is not an exchange or a protest. This is you, criminally harassing a private number after being told to stop contacting it. The fact I continue to tell you your behavior is criminal is not an excuse for your crime to continue.
 
G

guest

Guest
This didn't fit,

2021-09-16 10:48 UTC - You:
Not so, you are pig oinking back in man pig debate. I will look forward to being found and have offered numerous times to call again if a case or officer that is aware is provided, you refuse to do so. I have never been jn the civil case, despite you claiming I've been sued no incidents involving me or my username have been added. You're only case against me is too claim our talks are harrassment, I disagree but maybe a "stupid" cop and then a slow-witted judge will agree with yhe bright light hhat confessed all his lies on tape. You got Seth fucked too, no wonder he doesn't answer you.

2021-09-16 10:52 UTC - You:
Not so, you are pig oinking back in man pig debate. I will look forward to being found and have offered numerous times to call again if a case or officer that is aware is provided, you refuse to do so. I have never been jn the civil case, despite you claiming I've been sued no incidents involving me or my username have been added. You're only case against me is too claim our talks are harrassment, I disagree but maybe a "stupid" cop and then a slow-witted judge will agree with yhe bright light hhat confessed all his lies on tape. You got Seth fucked too, no wonder he doesn't answer you.

2021-09-16 10:52 UTC - You:
Do you have a police contact I can call?

2021-09-16 10:55 UTC - You:
As always liar Rick and his bluffs pay quasi
 

Clint Ruin

I'm sorry, who are you?
β€Ž
β€Ž
Forum Clout
51,141
Even if he didn't consent (he did), Wisconsin is one of many one-party states, a recording doesn't need his permission. It's perfectly legal and admissible, despite what he may think, you're allowed to lie to someone to get them to hang themself with their own words, cops do it literally every day.
 

peckafacce

Farted in Nikis pussy
β€Ž
β€Ž
Forum Clout
15,795
"
2021-09-16 10:30 UTC - +16085669287:
It is fraud because no, you are not a journalist, no, you do not work for HuffPost, and no, I did not consent for them to be made public. That is who I agreed to speak to, and on what conditions. You lied. That's why it's fraud and inadmissible. Surely even a complete mental case like you can understand. Sorry, atalker. But you have nothing except another criminal act to be charged with."


We all know he's retarted, but holy shit Rick. He didn't do his due diligence to vet who he was talking to.
 

HotDogJoe

Professional leech since 1994. Anyone can do it.
β€Ž
β€Ž
Forum Clout
79,959
Seethe and cope, oinky. Seethe cope.

Even if nothing from those tapes is admissible as evidence, you still made yourself look like an absolute fool to the world. You also admitted that you know the case is going terribly and that your only strategy is to try and wear quasi down by keep refiling pointless suits against him.

Think the SFWA are going to pull the funding on all this nonsense when they hear about the tapes (if they haven't already). How ya gonna fund it then?

Like I said, fat boy - seethe and cope.
 
G

guest

Guest
Even if he didn't consent (he did), Wisconsin is one of many one-party states, a recording doesn't need his permission. It's perfectly legal and admissible, despite what he may think, you're allowed to lie to someone to get them to hang the self with their own words, cops do it literally every day.
I told him that, he even conflated the Project Veritas thing with his tapes, but they did stuff at times in 2 party states and edited the footage, his is all raw. He literally has no hope of claiming anything other than he knew, and these screengrabs prove he is agreeing it happened as the recordings show.
 

Clint Ruin

I'm sorry, who are you?
β€Ž
β€Ž
Forum Clout
51,141
"
2021-09-16 10:30 UTC - +16085669287:
It is fraud because no, you are not a journalist, no, you do not work for HuffPost, and no, I did not consent for them to be made public. That is who I agreed to speak to, and on what conditions. You lied. That's why it's fraud and inadmissible. Surely even a complete mental case like you can understand. Sorry, atalker. But you have nothing except another criminal act to be charged with."


We all know he's retarted, but holy shit Rick. He didn't do his due diligence to vet who he was talking to.

I don't know why Rick thinks someone gets to dictate the conditions under which their leaked audio has permission to be released, he spends all day on Twitter, he knows full goddamned well that lawsuits, court cases and media publications are built around recordings obtained through deception and lying. There's maybe a handful of states where he could argue he didn't consent to the recording or did so under false pretense, but his state ain't one of those.
 
G

guest

Guest
Where are all the spelling mistakes? If it turns out covidcumia has been another invented character all along I won't be able to believe anything anymore.

I think he's lying about the calls being inadmissible but I'm not a lawyer. @notalawyer any info?
They're in there look at the log lol. They only happen in the back and forth stuff on the phone, because they keyboard is for tween girls on a phone.
 
Top