Pat’s pro se motion in full

[MonsterSteve]

Wait. Now he's saying his lawyers told him to not show up or pay his debt amortization? But he said on the stlaker podcast that it was his decision to not pay, no?

 

[peckafacce]

Wait. Now he's saying his lawyers told him to not show up or pay his debt amortization? But he said on the stlaker podcast that it was his decision to not pay, no?

1.7

 

[Sue Lightning]

FELONY RESTO HARASSMENT. Enjoy Prison.
View attachment 145509

…And almost 2 years later he still doesn’t understand you can’t just go into court and say “This person said this other person did this” without having a written statement from the said person.

 

[LoomisBuckby]

Pat claims he wrote the document with the assistance of a lawyer. Whether it was McCabe or someone else, that person is either a moron or a brazen liar — but perhaps both, just like Pat.

1 - Pat never consulted a single attorney for this document. If he did he would have named them. Or better yet they would have filed it on his behalf.
2 - If McCabe was in on this tactic to help him write the motion and purposely be retained by him a full working day before the case, she'd be risking her reputation as a lawyer and gain very unfavorably with the judge for the rest of their careers.

The babe would never do such a risky thing for a literal nobody like Pat. Especially as a young girlboss attorney with her whole career ahead of her.

 

[MonsterSteve]

I love how he can't even be bothered to attend this shit in person. I WANT MY DEMANDS MET CHILD, AND I WANT TO BE ABLE TO SPEAK TO THE JUDGE WITHOUT COMING TO THE COURTHOUSE BECAUSE I'M A FAT LAZY PERSON, LITTLE ONE.

 

[guest]

[MEDIA=vocaroo]1fdnm2xWjpjr[/MEDIA]


Jackie Singh might actually be the greatest troll of all time.

 

[Salted Earth Truffle]

risking her reputation as a lawyer

She’s Pat Tomlinson’s lawyer. Horse, barn door, etc.

 

[Meownaw]

1 - Pat never consulted a single attorney for this document. If he did he would have named them. Or better yet they would have filed it on his behalf.
2 - If McCabe was in on this tactic to help him write the motion and purposely be retained by him a full working day before the case, she'd be risking her reputation as a lawyer and gain very unfavorably with the judge for the rest of their careers.

The babe would never do such a risky thing for a literal nobody like Pat. Especially as a young girlboss attorney with her whole career ahead of her.

Prepared with the assistance of a lawyer. Did he ask a lawyer on Twitter something just to put that there?

 

[866-Ron-0-Fez]

…And almost 2 years later he still doesn’t understand you can’t just go into court and say “This person said this other person did this” without having a written statement from the said person.

I don't understand, I......

........YOU CAN'T!

 

[MonsterSteve]

my future wife McCabe's letter:
View attachment 145498

God this gets better and better. So, his new lawyers tried to get it pushed back 30 days. Rick tried to get it pushed back 60 days, and he wanted to be able to show up via zoom, not in person b/c he's uncomfortable in his TIGHT womans suit, and after all of that they laughed at him and told him NOPE, todays the day. He left the court yesterday in shambles for sure. He thought 100% that they would give him the continuance because he retained a lawyer only a day before the hearing. I love this place.

 

[Kim_Jong_Poon_]

4.) Quasi is not our friend.

 

[LoomisBuckby]

View attachment 145544
Prepared with the assistance of a lawyer. Did he ask a lawyer on Twitter something just to put that there?

"CHILD CHILD CHILD BABY JUDGE CHILD.... I did noT specify h-which counTry the lawyer who assisTed me pracTices in..."

 

[Sue Lightning]

16 Dick about the law but maybe someone who knows better can correct or corraborate me. Typos are a huge deal in legal documents. Filing pro se isn’t an excuse and is just another thing that’ll piss off a judge. He pulls two aggredious examples, mistyping the name of a case he’s citing and confusing the terms platiff and defendant. If i’m correct, any case he cited which was typed wrong is irrelevant and can’t be considered. Yes Sosnay could infer he’s talking about the case he spelled correctly the last 3 times but i dont think thats how that works. He would need to basically resumbit the document with the correct spelling. But if it’s not germaine to his overall argument, the confusing of plantiff and defendant definitely is. You then have to ask yourself who the fuck he’s even talking about and where. Was the one line a typo? Or was that the correct line? Back to refiling the entire argument after you correct it.

 

[SensibleKeks]

Why is Pat accusing quasi of being the admin? Seems a bit far-fetched to me.

 

[Slackjawed Cow]

Pat claims he wrote the document with the assistance of a lawyer. Whether it was McCabe or someone else, that person is either a moron or a brazen liar — but perhaps both, just like Pat.

It was probably either penny eater Peter or Rakdaddy that he claims as his legal assistance. Its full of mistakes. Its so unprofessional. I have always known that once pat is in court, that he will always fuck things up for himself. He can cray and make accusation in the court of twitter but under oath he will either get caught in lies, have an outburst, or not provide sufficient evidence.

 

[Dougie's Hapa Daughter]

1 - Pat never consulted a single attorney for this document. If he did he would have named them. Or better yet they would have filed it on his behalf.
2 - If McCabe was in on this tactic to help him write the motion and purposely be retained by him a full working day before the case, she'd be risking her reputation as a lawyer and gain very unfavorably with the judge for the rest of their careers.

The babe would never do such a risky thing for a literal nobody like Pat. Especially as a young girlboss attorney with her whole career ahead of her.

Since you're a new cumchum, I'll explain something to you: Salted Earth is like ElliotRodgersBRAPTherapist crossed with Valuum crossed with an unironic transsexual. They're a kiwifarms poster who doctored screenshots to deceive and defraud brothermen. Just car-crash their posts and move on, lest you lower your caste further.

 

[guest]

Quasi is not our friend.

We used to talk on the phone for hours

 

[Officer Chase]

16 Dick about the law but maybe someone who knows better can correct or corraborate me. Typos are a huge deal in legal documents. Filing pro se isn’t an excuse and is just another thing that’ll piss off a judge. He pulls two aggredious examples, mistyping the name of a case he’s citing and confusing the terms platiff and defendant. If i’m correct, any case he cited which was typed wrong is irrelevant and can’t be considered. Yes Sosnay could infer he’s talking about the case he spelled correctly the last 3 times but i dont think thats how that works. He would need to basically resumbit the document with the correct spelling. But if it’s not germaine to his overall argument, the confusing of plantiff and defendant definitely is. You then have to ask yourself who the fuck he’s even talking about and where. Was the one line a typo? Or was that the correct line? Back to refiling the entire argument after you correct it.

I think it's more about credibility but Scrivener's errors are allowed to be corrected when lawyers make them.

 

[guest]

Typos are a huge deal in legal documents.

No they're not. At most the judge asks for clarification but a typo isn't going to derail a case.