- Forum Clout
- 67,993
It's almost not even worth having sex with women anymore.
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
What about with men?It's almost not even worth having sex with women anymore.
Serious dating leaves more room for imaginary infractions.If he had started dating them seriously they wouldn’t have had a single complaint.
If only."Autists are all potential rapists" is an amazing place to land.
You can't court a Leftist audience, and you can't talk to your female fans. That's the true moral here.
General rule I was told by a peer, who I'll respectfully keep nameless: if you're around a woman you don't know, no matter how well intentioned the conversation or gesture is both ways, you keep it public and with witnesses around you.
It sucks it has to be that way, and I've thankfully never ran into any accusations - probably because I don't leer like these closet pervs - but I don't want to be falsely accused either. I'd like to keep meeting sane people, thank you.
This thread is hilarious
"This is really, really upsetting and disappointing. I thought Neil Gaiman was a safe celebrity to look up to."
You ever thought of looking up to people who aren't celebrities you've never met, you stupid cunt?
Here's that user's post history:
View attachment 209083
Your average reader of modern fiction. Ask me how I know they're a white woman.
Don't make media so garbage you have female fans.You can't court a Leftist audience, and you can't talk to your female fans. That's the true moral here.
as a guy who enjoys Ennis, he better not turn out to ever be a sex offender, that fucking Mick.
"I went juuuust a little too far: my penis actually grazed my girlfriend's cunt lips. I apologized though and put the egg back where it belonged."All men see themselves as good guys who could get accused of rape at anytime.
i mean- I've seen enough interviews with him
it' would actually be refreshing that he sexually assaults something
he has the personality of a dead moth
All this being said, I conclude that Neil Gaiman is a child and dog fucker because Patrick S. Tomlinson likes his work. Fucking faggots.
It says a lot that it's mostly sci-fi community degenerates and trannies coming to the defense of Gaiman. The trannies are saying it's "TERFs" that have colluded to take down Gaiman because he's allegedly a "trans ally".
He's admitted to be a sexual degenerate. He and that BPD psycho Amanda Palmer were terminally online throughout their relationship and very T.M.I. with everything. Gaiman is also a piece of shit who cheated on his first wife and abandoned his kids to be with Amanda Palmer and stick his dick everywhere. Then he abandoned Palmer and their baby in New Zealand during the plandemic and flew to Scotland claiming he wanted to be in the same time zone as his friends. Later, his fans found out he had actually flown there because he'd planned on leaving Palmer for some groupie who lived there. The groupie lost interest when she met this jew freak in person and that was over. Then he went back to New Zealand and he and Palmer tried to work it out, very publicly again, but Palmer didn't want him sticking his dick in everything anymore with an open relationship, so they announced their divorce.
This isn't the first time Gaiman has been accused of sexual assault. Those rumors have been following him around for many years.
Need more female insight, bam bamAll men see themselves as good guys who could get accused of rape at anytime.
Not to be an armchair shrink or anything, but... I almost have sympathy for a Jew who was raised Scientologist because it's probably not his fault for acting out in a degenerate sexual way; after all it's not like he's a pedophile (he probably is) or anything that bad. But at some point you have to look in the mirrorThe groupie lost interest when she met this jew freak in person and that was over.
So she could get rapedNeed more female insight, bam bam
Why would that woman (altho ugly) date a guy who has the Eric hildeman look (pedo beard, glasses, shirt)
I've come to accept that any photo of a girl in social media is just the tip of the iceberg; it's only the most flattering pictures. So, this whore looks okay and probably out of this pedo's league, but consider the following:Need more female insight, bam bam
Why would that woman (altho ugly) date a guy who has the Eric hildeman look (pedo beard, glasses, shirt)
Yeah true. Also his post implied she got mad at him for being "rapey". Hysterical cunt. Imagine dating a woman who didn't let you do anything to her.I've come to accept that any photo of a girl in social media is just the tip of the iceberg; it's only the most flattering pictures. So, this whore looks okay and probably out of this pedo's league, but consider the following:
1) fake eyelashes when she's wearing casual clothes, WHY!? /Florentine
2) fat half nigger/half Polack nose which would look brutal from another angle
3) can't see the rest of her body, probably a disaster
4) there are guys out there who date below their league due to personality disorders/being autistic, and THAT is what she settles for
She's a disaster, guaranteed.
Porn is bad. Repeatedly abandoning your multiple families because you want to coom is based. I'm sorry you're so stupid.and realise that, hey, I've got four kids and, I dunno, I can just wank to porn if I'm horny. He's lucky he had a wife, let alone two
This forum is dedicated exclusively to parody, comedy, and satirical content. None of the statements, opinions, or depictions shared on this platform should be considered or treated as factual information under any circumstances. All content is intended for entertainment purposes only and should be regarded as fictional, exaggerated, or purely the result of personal opinions and creative expression.
Please be aware that this forum may feature discussions and content related to taboo, controversial, or potentially offensive subjects. The purpose of this content is not to incite harm but to engage in satire and explore the boundaries of humor. If you are sensitive to such subjects or are easily offended, we kindly advise that you leave the forum.
Any similarities to real people, events, or situations are either coincidental or based on real-life inspirations but used within the context of fair use satire. By accepting this disclaimer, you acknowledge and understand that the content found within this forum is strictly meant for parody, satire, and entertainment. You agree not to hold the forum, its administrators, moderators, or users responsible for any content that may be perceived as offensive or inappropriate. You enter and participate in this forum at your own risk, with full awareness that everything on this platform is purely comedic, satirical, or opinion-based, and should never be taken as factual information.
If any information or discussion on this platform triggers distressing emotions or thoughts, please leave immediately and consider seeking assistance.
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (USA): Phone: 1-800-273-TALK (1-800-273-8255) Website: https://suicidepreventionlifeline.org/