Think about the fact though that Trump is so fucking arrogant and retarded he got caught doing something that wasn't illegal until he tried to lie about it, which made it a crime.
-
- Mr. Tomlinson's feud started after members of the now-defunct Reddit site r/opieandanthony got his Twitter account suspended, causing him to threaten some bored trolls who never heard of him with a libel lawsuit. The trolls responded predictably.
- Mr. Tomlinson has been instructed many times by friends, family, police, and attorneys to stop engaging with his trolls, and that continuing to provoke them will cause him to be trolled even more. Mr. Tomlinson wilfully ignores this advice
- He would eventually file a defamation suit against 60 anonymous people which was dismissed with Mr. Tomlinson being ordered to pay $34,762.25 for opposing parties' attorney fees.
- He ended up paying $83,736.99 due to his unsuccessful attempts to dodge the court-ordered judgement, for which he faced jail time and contempt charges.
- He also filed 2 frivolous restraining orders against people who had engaged in First Amendment-protected behavior (one for texting him and another for attending his contempt of court hearing), both of which were dismissed.
- Early on in the lawsuit, Mr. Tomlinson vandalized his own motorcycle and submitted a false police report blaming the people he was suing.
- He accidentally sent surveillance video of the alleged vandal (himself) to a troll.
- Mr. Tomlinson has never shown this video footage during any of his media tours, and desperately tries to scrub it from the internet.
- Mr. Tomlinson claims that the surveillance video was initiated by his "motion-activated" camera, which only collects "30 seconds at a time", despite the video being 32 seconds long and beginning several seconds before the "vandal" enters into the frame.
- On 13 April 2023, the individual responsible for calling the fake emergencies (SWATs) to Mr. Tomlinson's house, a SWAT-for-hire dealer named "Torswats", revealed that Mr. Tomlinson ordered the SWATs to his own house because he wanted to get in the news and sue the MPD for money.
- Torswats would repeat these allegations in private chats which were not intended for public view.
- Mr. Tomlinson has gone on multiple news tours since the SWATtings started in order to promote his victimhood brand, utilizing the services of Lenora Claire.
- He also recently sued the MPD for money.
-
Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
[email protected]
Jim Norton makes bold opinion!
- Thread starter Sue Lightning
- Start date
I mean it depends on what we’re talking about because theres sort of two thoughts to it. Theres Presidential crimes and “Presidential crimes”.
Presidential crimes are like Obama drone striking a US citizen. It’s technically murder, but the Constitution basically protects any President from prosecution for “official acts”
“Presidential crimes” however are like Clinton raping women before he was President. It doesn’t even reasonably fall under “official acts”. He should have been prosecuted but beyond the statute of limitations, lack of physical proof, etc…we all know theres some sort of double standard. Like unironically Hilary should probably be in jail for her email shit if Trump is going to be prosecuted over this.
American politics is a game where they’re all doing blatantly illegal things and figuring out how to fudge as few details as possible to make it legal. Trump just didn’t want to bother with the last part.
And no one would know about any of this if Cohen didn’t flip. How the fuck you let your lawyer and fixer flip on you is beyond me. The Clintons were smart because they would just kill you before your home even got raided.
Yeah again refer to above. If Trump were dealing with the same email scandal as Clinton he would be on every news station talking about how he did it but it was perfectly legal. Which is a way different strategy than Hilarys “Oh geez shucks i dont know how that got on there and then deleted! Mustve been an accident!”
I guess that's my point. Many of them get away with what is essentially mass murder on an industrial scale and are treated like semi-deities by the establishment for the rest of their days. Stupid Trump shags a whore, sets up a dummy Corp to pay her off and dumbly writes it off as a campaign contribution, and the state puts all its gears into motion to take him down.
The kicker is they're too hubristic to see it's doing nothing except shoring up his base and making a bunch of undecideds think "I'm going to vote for this guy now, even though I don't really like him, because fuck them."
Thats the whole thing - it’s sets it up for now whatever party lost to go after a president / previous president because they can. George W Bush for war crimes, Obama drone strikes, etc.
It’s kind of like how democrats impeached trump then did it again. It meant nothing but just for show - he’s the only president impeached twice! So? Nothing happened and it was a big waste of time. What was once seen as serious is now just business as usual.
No not really because of what I just described. Those are Presidential crimes i.e, explicitly allowed under the constitution. Taking home boxes of classified documents, not an official act (especially cuz it was done after he was President), nor is the whole hush money from before he was President, nor is the defamation trial, nor is the business fraud trial.
The ONLY crime that could reasonably be considered an “official act” is ironically the Jan 6th shit.
So if they want to prosecute shit Obama or Biden has done that had nothing to do with their official acts i say go for it.
I agree with the first part but not the second part. Trump is insanely unpopular, the dude lost the popular vote twice. (No less against Hilary and Biden - The two most unlikable Dems ever). If anything all these trials are doing is turning off independent voters. They’ve done polls on this (lol, polls) showing like 20% of Republicans wouldn’t vote for Trump if he were convicted. 50% of likely voters think Trump is guilty on the hush money shit. So optics wise it’s…not good
Who gives a fuck? Lmao
Because he asked dummy. Lets ask. @LockedHDD__Pot do you care? I mean you did enough to ask the question.
If you don’t care why are you spending time to comment retard?
For every hysterical faggot like you crying about bullshit fake crimes like this you are creating 100 non gay normal people to purposely vote Trump to upset you.
You sound upset. Are you sure you “don’t care”? Trumps gonna win, right? So just sit back and enjoy watching me seethe dummy.
Is he that unpopular though? Didn't he get more votes in 2020 than any other candidate ever except Biden (who needed 5 weeks or whatever to tally up a higher number). And isn't that also why your founding fathers established the electoral college? To prevent a handful of heavily-populated urban centres from determining the outcome of every election through numbers rather than proportional state-based representation?
Yeah I would say so. The 2016 EC result was a blow out by Trump but Clinton beat him by 3 million votes, then Biden by 7 million (if you believe that, lol). Its extremely hard to be LESS popular when running for reelection but even he was. The only President to have a consistently lower approval rating than him is Carter and HW, but only towards the end of their terms. W. Bush had a higher approval rating for his ENTIRE Presidency. 2016 was one of the first elections in a while where neither candidate pulled a majority of the vote. (Trump 46%, Clinton 48%). The states that flipped for Trump in 2016 only did so by very meager percentage points, literally less than 1%.
The problem is he’s divisive. If you’re a Republican you love him. If you’re a Democrat you hate him. I don’t THINK a President has ever been that bad. I mean the big thing was Democrats for Reagan and then Clinton got some good shares of R’s.
A big reason Trump won 2016 is the anti-establishment crowd. He became part of the establishment in 2020 which is why those voters ended up voting libertarian (and thus costing him Wisconsin) I think those people are honestly going to lean more RFK in 2024.
Yes that but thats because of voter turnout and increasing populations. We’ve had elections with higher turnouts and if you applied our current voting population there would be candidates who would have gotten way more votes than Biden OR Trump.
Well…thats sort of complicated I suppose. Mainly because that was the 1700’s. The Founding Fathers only let white men with property vote and they didn’t expect that even those people would be educated. So those dudes would vote and then send their “delegate” to DC who (even though bound to his vote) could technically still vote against who the people voted for. How would anyone know? Not like they released the specifics back then, and even if they did you’d have to wait a week for the news to get to you. The electoral college is just antiquated IMO but thats a whole other thing
Don’t get me going on US politics
How old are you really, bro?
why did I get dragged back into this? I did ask a genuine question so thank you but fukkin 'ell.
I like to loff, dance, & ryhme... those are the tenants of my being. I dunno.
Well, then you're an anomaly these days. Kudos
Oh wow! Who possibly gives a fuck?