TODAY ON TWITTER: Patrick calls for a pizza boycott. Also, he gets into a fight with his lawyer

[guest]

 

[Clint Ruin]

Lol. So he went from acting like anyone that fucks with him on Twitter is Canyon Boykin to acting like everyone fucking with him on Twitter is Quasi. What a simple fuck.

 

[guest]

That's his "win"? The fact that all the money he spent on the lawsuit was OTHER PEOPLE'S hard earned cash, not his. Haha!

 

[stealthygeek]

Nice rapidly increasing detachment from reality, stupid.

"You're not the real Attorney Resto but in fact the incel mastermind quasi himself!"
--Gumshoe Rick

 

[TheDarkFezRises]

This is what he's clinging to now - "I'm not paying childy child, sweetie boy, baby infant, honeysuckle little one."

This is what he thinks would be a victory.

You won't be acting like this in front of the judge, Fatrick. I hope Mr Peña has showed the judge just how much contempt you have for him, his courtroom, and the legal system in general.

 

[Gay Faggot.]

I’m sure those 7 “MKE peeps” are really going to effect pizza man a lot. Fat deranged lunatic.

 

[Clint Ruin]

Nice rapidly increasing detachment from reality, stupid.

"You're not the real Attorney Resto but in fact the incel mastermind quasi himself!" --Gumshoe Rick

I remember at the beginning of all this, he acted for months like everyone fucking with him was just one guy. I guess I thought he'd grown out of that at some point, but it's probably some deliberate choice. He probably thinks that if Quasi's quash gets shot down, he at least has one name and he'll just attribute everything to that one name he has. Fat people are stupid.

 

[stealthygeek]

That's his "win"? The fact that all the money he spent on the lawsuit was OTHER PEOPLE'S hard earned cash, not his. Haha!

Loved how he autistically screamed over Josiah's valid criticisms of Pat's lack of guilt over spending over $100k from well intentioned idiots. It's like he's bragging about not having enough balls/money to finance this himself and instead conned others into buying his victim horseshit.

 

[Brooke Shields]

he wants to manifest reality by claiming the one fucking with him is Quasi even though there's no TANGENTIAL proof connecting any account that fucks with him to Quasi

for all i know Quasi just likes hosting forums

 

[guest]

And to think this three year long autistic sperg is only the beginning. It seriously has only just begun. The SFWA, Nana and Pig Man are both headed in the same Obscure direction. Oopsie Doodles!

Oblivious dumb fucks.

 

[Ant_It_Fun]

I don't get his call for a boycott. Because of leaky pipes?

 

[guest]

That's his "win"? The fact that all the money he spent on the lawsuit was OTHER PEOPLE'S hard earned cash, not his. Haha!

I mean, what else does he have? He was catfished and spilled intimate details of his case to a prank caller and when the ruse was finally revealed, he sperged out like an effeminate fag voice. There are articles detailing it being published on a well-known website. He's 120k in the hole for a failing lolsuit. His attempts at beating the atalkers have only lead to more people finding out the real truth about him. He's got no book deal. He's got no movie deal. He's got no job, no real source if income. It's the only thread he's clinging to at this point.

I may have dropped 100k but you spent 25 thousand and you're not getting it back atalker.

Couple all of that with the fact that he's 41 years old and has made nothing of his life and it's just a pathetic, miserable existence. That's why he's constantly lashing out and has anger issues. It's not the booze or the atalkers. Nobody hates him nearly as much as he hates himself.

 

[guest]

I don't get his call for a boycott. Because of leaky pipes?

Everyone answer is his father did a shitty job raising him.

 

[stealthygeek]

I don't get his call for a boycott. Because of leaky pipes?

It's getting into the neighboring bar and preventing people from getting shitfaced and making a scene out front by sloppily screaming at an incel cybernazi stlaker and repeatedly calling them "baby child."

 

[UnPRePared]

I don't get his call for a boycott. Because of leaky pipes?

If Piggy Pat doesn't get tasty treats, the cries commence.

And the walkout workers are clearly asshole atalkers trying to prevent him from committing Diabetic destruction.

 

[IGotATreeOnMyHouse85]

“Peeps”? Nobody has said “Peeps” in years except when talking about those gross marshmallow Easter Candy. This 41 year old loser is the Steve Buscemi “How do you do, fellow kids?” Meme come to life.

 

[TheDarkFezRises]

I don't get his call for a boycott. Because of leaky pipes?

Edit: nevermind I'm a retard.

 

[Harry Powell]

I have no idea why, but Asian Rick S. Tomrinsin got me so good

 

[TorquieTwoBeers]

All that money you spent is gone, and you are never getting it back.

*hits "Return" twice for effect*

And it's really got you scared.

Setting aside the fact that Pat is not conversing with Queso and therefore "BrintonResto" has not spent a nickel, there's this from El Tigre's latest filing:

Here's the lowdown on CCP §1987.2(c):

California Code, Code of Civil Procedure - CCP § 1987.2 | FindLaw

California Code of Civil Procedure CCP CA CIV PRO Section 1987.2. Read the code on FindLaw

codes.findlaw.com

Relevant section:

(c) If a motion is filed under Section 1987.1 for an order to quash or modify a subpoena from a court of this state for personally identifying information, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 1798.79.8 of the Civil Code , for use in an action pending in another state, territory, or district of the United States, or in a foreign nation, and that subpoena has been served on any Internet service provider, or on the provider of any other interactive computer service, as defined in Section 230(f)(2) of Title 47 of the United States Code , if the moving party prevails, and if the underlying action arises from the moving party's exercise of free speech rights on the Internet and the respondent has failed to make a prima facie showing of a cause of action, the court shall award the amount of the reasonable expenses incurred in making the motion, including reasonable attorney's fees.

Emphasis mine. Oopsie doodles, Pat! Looks like, according to the law, if Queso prevails, you better get out your (or, more likely, Mama Raven's) checkbook.

 

[Pat_Torque_Monday]

I’m sure those 7 “MKE peeps” are really going to effect pizza man a lot. Fat deranged lunatic.

Actually seven others with appetites as large as Patrick might put quite a sizeable dent in Pizza Man's trade.