Apparently death wishes and threats of violence from the pig get context, but breaking his balls is terrorism.

[guest]

This bloated turd really needs to be beaten to death by some shine he thinks is an ally.

[URL unfurl="true"]https://twitter.com/stealthygeek/status/1424936946724483074[/URL]

 

[AwfulManTitTankTop]

It's a handful of a hundred posts. Maybe a thousand. A couple bad apples. Really he's a good guy.

 

['THE NIGGER MAN']

2 likes​

 

[TheRevAlJolson]

2 likes​

Nothing we can say about him is as insulting as the disapproval of his 46,500 followers

 

[Brooke Shields]

it's funny cause pretty much all screenshots show the context of the conversation and he just looks like an ass

 

[TorqueWheeler]

Ahh, it all makes sense now!

When people disagree with Pat they deserve to be threatened with violence or called a cumrag or a fucking idiot or endure being called “wee dick” hundreds of times for 24-36 hours. That’s the context that’s missing from Cav’s article!

 

[Will Tate]

it's funny cause pretty much all screenshots show the context of the conversation and he just looks like an ass

It's the same as him calling the submitted evidence of his abusive behavior on Twitter "irrelevant." Only consider the context I give you, child.
Pat, that KiwiFarms thread is the silver bullet to any horseshit you can think to spew. You're better known for it than for all of that kindling you call your author's catalogue. How's that feel, fucker?

 

[Caverlock]

Of course, special boy cites no example of a single thing being taken out of context.

Pig, remember when you misleadingly extracted a single sentence from its paragraph of CONTEXT and subsequent ample supporting evidence to swear that I falsely claimed you advocate for violence against women? Do you remember when I proved beyond all doubt with dozens of your own archived statements that span years that you condone violence against women whose political beliefs you find disagreeable? From punching women to elbowing women to throwing drinks on women to "intimidating" women. So much so, in fact, you said you would find people to do the punching and elbowing, and lamented that the backwash-filled drinks weren't being thrown on them on a daily basis. It's all archived.

You're the dishonest cyberbully, Patrick, not me.

 

[Will Tate]

Do you remember when I proved beyond all doubt with dozens of your own archived statements that span years that you condone violence against women whose political beliefs you find disagreeable? From punching women to elbowing women to throwing drinks on women to "intimidating" women.

That doesn't help my narrative that I am a victim, child. Quietly, now.

 

[Kim_Jong_Poon]

Pig, remember when you misleadingly extracted a single sentence from its paragraph of CONTEXT and subsequent ample supporting evidence to swear that I falsely claimed you advocate for violence against women? Do you remember when I proved beyond all doubt with dozens of your own archived statements that span years that you condone violence against women whose political beliefs you find disagreeable? From punching women to elbowing women to throwing drinks on women to "intimidating" women. So much so, in fact, you said you would find people to do the punching and elbowing, and lamented that the backwash-filled drinks weren't being thrown on them on a daily basis. It's all archived.

You're the dishonest cyberbully, Patrick, not me.

 

[HotDogJoe]

Do you remember when I proved beyond all doubt with dozens of your own archived statements that span years that you condone violence against women whose political beliefs you find disagreeable?

The man asked you a question, piggy. Don't be rude. Answer.